Laserfiche WebLink
J; J <br /> f <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> D <br /> DATE: NOVEMBER 8, 1994 <br /> T0: DONNA HERAN,ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTHDIVISION <br /> FROM: DIANE HIN O , UNIRVISING R.E.H.S. <br /> SITE MITIGATION <br /> SUBJECT: LODI CONCRETE COMPANY (MR/MRS HARRY LORZ) <br /> 381 W TADDEI RD, LOD <br /> In response to your recent request for clarification regardingt of Supervise e 13 September <br /> r She 194 above <br /> Neumiller and Beardsley correspondence copied to the <br /> referenced contaminated site, the following staff report explains the events involving <br /> Environmental Health. ' <br /> Ms. Birkie, Neumilier & Beard <br /> slee has made false statements in her September 13, 1994 <br /> fetter to <br /> PHS-EHD. Ms. Birk states that PHS-EHD has no Iauthority <br /> tl�e C eanup participate <br /> uindtprogram. <br /> review process for determining eligibility for the participates uthoty within the LOP contract to require <br /> This is grossly incorrect; PHS-EHD has statutorytify both no <br /> I action by all responsible parties at UST release sites <br /> the tore tie action <br /> e <br /> remedial i <br /> RWQCB and the SWRCB in the event of noncompliant <br /> requirements. � <br /> during the course of the in were the Lorzs compliant with the � <br /> At no timed 9 <br /> tion law. Therefore, the Lorzs were ineligible Februaryl1 O,t1994 at which time <br /> the Cleanup <br /> corrective ac , <br /> Fund. The SWRCB issuedhe enial letter to process at the SWRCB. <br /> the Lorzs were notified of appeal <br /> Dave Deaner, Manager of the SWRCB Cleanup ect# wrote laim to. <br /> On March 11, 1994, Mr. Da 1g, 1994 staff decision to rel aid for certai <br /> Lorzs regarding their appeal of the February <br /> Cleanup Fund. Mr. Deaner confirmed "that the Conways performed and p <br /> the Cle p undertaking on your part." Mr. Deaner further stated tr <br /> corrective action costs without any agreement';in a to <br /> the Cleanup Fund "cannot reimburse an amountogroeerated the UST the Conways could <br /> furthermore, because the Conways never ownedp i <br /> not be reimbursed due to ineligibility to the Cleanup Fund. Water <br /> Clean <br /> Birkie appealed Mr. Deaner's decision to the t hrtelned thatDivision <br /> the o original of <br /> staff decision <br /> Ms• noncompliance wi�. <br /> Programs, Mr. Harry Schueller. Mr. Schuefler noncomp <br /> den the Lorzs eligibility was based upon further stated that becausdocuments e the site had bee <br /> Y <br /> corrective action directives. Mr. PHS- ler issue was no longer in eff+ <br /> cleaned up to the satisfaction of PHS-EHD, corrective action directives had been camp <br /> with. Therefore, Mr. Schue!!er ruled that the noncompliance <br /> _ IdLVU database. <br />