Laserfiche WebLink
multiple sets of data give a high degree of confidence Mw-, <br /> to the attenuation rate When interpreting the results <br /> of this approach, it is important to understand that if 0 Well " <br /> weu <br /> the mass of contaminant remains constant over time <MEi)this could indicate that the inputs fromsources are MWiMw s <br />' balanced by attenuation mechanisms, or that no source <br /> is active and no actual degradation is occurring Mw-a <br /> While the mass balance approach can provide precise <br />' quantitative evaluation of natural attenuation, the OA"rovmmeConcentratwnCentou" <br /> approach is often impractical due to the extensive moni- • MonHonnp well <br /> toring data and intensive data analyses required An • Source Area <br /> appropriate approach for most sites from a cost-effec- Figs 3 Recommended ground water monitonng well network <br />' tiveness perspective would be to utilize more easily along the primary plume flow path for demonstrating natural <br /> applied indicators such as plume characteristics and dis- attenuation <br /> solved oxygen in conjunction with a confirmatory moni- IV <br />' toring program Evaluation of plume characteristics <br /> over time may not allow precise quantification of rates ' <br /> of attenuation but it will reliably determine if contami- 10 <br />' i nant migration is limited or prevented by natural phe- ' <br /> romera Dissolved oxygen indicators are not used to ' <br /> quantify natural attenuation but to determine if aerobic U 10= a <br /> ficant attenuation mechanism o <br /> biodegradation is a signi <br />' The indicators described below have been derived from Cl <br /> detailed studies of natural attenuation and are sup- 10` <br /> ported by data from multiple sites Grounawneer <br /> Flog. <br /> Decreasing Primary Flow Path Concentrations <br /> In order to demonstrate natural attenuation in this source 1000 `xx' <br /> manner it is important to place a sufficient number of l'oa'm" Distance from Source (ft) <br /> ground water monitoring points as close along the pr1- Figure 4 Benzene concentrations along the plume flow path at <br /> mary plume flow path as possible (Figures) To identify a New York service station. <br /> I the primary flow path, monitoring points such as .%4W-7 <br /> and MW-8 must be placed to define the transverse extent los j <br /> of the plume If natural attenuation is occurringat a �ee Ips <br /> � � is -� sept i9v3 <br /> spill or release site the contaminant concentrations will �—Ats Imo, <br /> decrease with distance from the source along the flow <br /> path of The plume Figure 4 clearly demonstrates this <br /> behavior for a service station in New York where Baso- <br /> line was released The beniene concentrations along the ; ! <br /> primary flow path decreased from 2600 ppb at the U 1o' • �! <br /> source to 2 7 ppb at a distance 1425 feet downgradient <br /> The decrease in concentrations with distance from the to' • <br /> source directly indicates that some degree of natural <br /> attenuation is occurring If no natural attenuation (I a 10ND •+ID No <br /> no biodegradation no source decay no volatilization 0 Soo 1000 1500 <br /> or insignificant dispersion) was occurring, then concen- Distance from Source <br /> trations would remain relativeiv constant to the leading Figure 5 Toluene concentrations along the plume centerline at <br /> edge where a sharp front would be observed In reality three monitoring events at a New York service station <br /> some degree of natural attenuation will always be Notes:Source concentirations were not measured on"2 and <br /> observed due to physical processes such as dispersion 9/92 due to the presence of free product <br /> P <br /> and volatilization Evaluation of the centerline concen- Not ail wells were sampled at each monitoring event - <br /> trations over time will determine if the plume is migrat- trations should be monitored routinely for use as Ind- <br /> mg or not Toluene centerline concentrations from the icators of natural attenuation <br /> Vew York service station are shown in Figure 5 over a <br /> six-month period In addition to decreasing with dist- Steady-State Plume <br /> ante from the source the toluene plume retreated over In addition to centerline concentrations, historical <br /> time as the nondetect point for toluene receded toward monitoring data for the entire plume can be examined <br /> the source in successive monitoring events The receding to determine if the contaminant plume is at steady state, <br /> toluene plume probably resulted from decreasing source receding, or continuing to migrate If the extent of the <br /> concentration over time Thus,plume centerline concen- plume has not changed over a significant period of time, <br /> 166 a SPRING 1994 GWMR <br />