Laserfiche WebLink
14 July 2005 <br /> . AGE-NC Protect No 00-0696 <br /> IPage 2 of 4 <br /> Temperature, pH, and conductivity of the purged water were measured at regular Intervals for <br /> stabilization using an Oakton water analyzer Field sheets and data are provided in Appendix C <br /> Purged water was containerized in properly labeled,Department of Transportation(DOT)-approved <br /> 55-gallon drums and stored on-site pending proper disposal <br /> 23 COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> Ground water samples were collected from each monitoring well using the disposable bailers after <br /> allowing the wells to achieve a minimum 80%recovery of the pre-purge water volume Each water <br /> sample was transferred into three laboratory-supplied, 40-milliliter (ml) volatile organic analysis <br /> (VOA) vials containing 0 5 ml 18% hydrochloric acid solution as a sample preservative, and one <br /> 1-liter amber bottle without preservative After collection,the samples were properly labeled,placed <br /> in a chilled container, and transported under chain of custody to Cal Tech Environmental <br /> Laboratories(CTEL),a State of California Department of Health Services(DHS)-certified analytical <br /> Ilaboratory, for analysis The samples were analyzed for <br /> . - Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline and diesel (TPH-g and TPH-d, <br />' respectively) in accordance with EPA Method 8015M, and <br /> Benzene,toluene,ethylbenzene,and total xylenes(BTEX)and fuel additives methyl tertiary- <br /> butyl ether(MTBE), tertiary-butyl alcohol (TBA), di-isopropyl ether(DIPE), ethyl tertiary- <br /> butyl ether(ETBE),tertiary-amyl methyl ether(TAME), 1,2-dibromoethane(EDB),and 1,2- <br /> dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) in accordance with EPA Method 8260B <br /> I <br /> 3.0. FINDINGS <br /> Ground water elevation and flow direction were inferred from field data, hydrocarbon impact to <br /> ground water was quantified by laboratory analysis of the ground water samples <br /> 3 1 GROUND WATER GRADIENT AND FLOW DIRECTION <br /> The elevation of ground water in each of the monitoring wells was calculated by subtracting the <br /> depths to ground water from the surveyed relative casing elevations (Table 1) Depths to ground <br /> water ranged from 4 92 feet(MW-4)to 5 93 feet(MW-1)below the tops of the well casings Ground <br /> water elevation at the site ranged from 17 68 feet (MW-4) to 17 81 feet (MW-3) below mean sea <br /> Ievel (MSL), and averaged approximately 17 73 feet below MSL, indicating a decrease in ground <br /> water elevation of approximately 0 92 feet since the last monitoring event in February 2004 <br /> EAdvanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br /> I <br />