SU0013407 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Tenneco West PO. Box 9380 TENNECO ATenneco Company Bakersfield California 93389 (805) 832-9010 February 12, lP$1 FEB 17 1981 SAN ih' QUIN LOCAL Mr. C. Leland Hall , R.S. , Director HEALTH DISTRICT Environmental Health Division San Joaquin Local Health District P. O. Box 2009 Stockton, California 95201 Dear Mr. Hall : Your January 16 , 1981 letter to Tenneco West, Inc. was forwarded to my attention. I am responding to the letter because I believe the conditions actually imposed by the local health district for the Conditional Use Permit are incorrectly stated (and probably inadvertently so) in your letter. It is my recollection that prior to the public hearing on the matter of the Conditional Use Permit, Rich Handel and I met with you and various staff members in your department to discuss the conditions which your division proposed. There was discussion and some confu- sion over the oxidation process recommendation, among other things. You indicated that your department would not recommend specific actions to be taken by Tenneco West, and that recommendation of the oxidation process was erroneously made. You said that the oxidation process condition (which is listed as No. 3 in your January 16 letter) would be deleted and alternative conditions proposed at the public hearing. At the hearing a representative of your division substituted the con- ditions that Tenneco West comply with Rule 407 and Rule 418 of the Air Pollution Control District Regulations for the oxidation process recommendation. Attached for your reference is a copy of the approved Use Permit Application which was sent to us by the Planning Department and which we received on January 22 , 1981 . I would appreciate your confirmation of this substitution of conditions . Naturally, we will notify your department when all of the conditions listed in the Use Permit attached have been met. Very tru ours, (Ms . ) Suellen . A derson Corporate Counsel SHA: sk Attachment cc : Mr. R. Handel