Laserfiche WebLink
SS11. <br /> GROUNDWATER py � <br /> I�I TECHNOLOGY, INC. 1401 Halyard Drive,Suite 140,West SacraJrCA 95691.(916)372-4700 <br /> FAX(916)372-8781 <br /> February 3, 1995 <br /> Mr. Dave Deaner <br /> State Water Resources Control Board <br /> Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund <br /> P. O. Box 944212 <br /> Sacramento, California 94244-2120 <br /> Subject: Former Drake Property <br /> 26485 Thornton Road, Thornton, CA <br /> UST Cleanup Fund Claim Number 008360 <br /> GTI Project 02070 0053 <br /> Dear Mr. Deaner: <br /> Groundwater Technology submits this letter as a request to review Claim Number 008360. This letter is <br /> written in response to a letter from Ms. Lydia Bracco,of the State Water Resources Control Board dated <br /> January 27, 1995, stating that claim number 008360 was not eligible for reimbursement from the UST <br /> Cleanup Fund and that the Board Intended removal of her claim from the Priority List. The Board stated <br /> that Mrs. Drake had not compiled with corrective action directives issued by the lead agency, San <br /> Joaquin County Environmental Health Division. The statement of non-compliance is untrue, and should <br /> not be used as the reason for removing Mrs. Drake's claim from the Priority List. <br /> Groundwater Technology was contracted by Barbara Drake on August 9, 1994 to execute the scope of <br /> work outlined in her request for proposals dated March 14 and March 28, 1994. The general scope of <br /> work included additional investigation of the extent of hydrocarbon-impacted groundwater and <br /> supervision/sampling of over-excavation of an area of hydrocarbon-impacted soil defined by Wallace <br /> and Kuhl and Associates in their Preliminary Investigation and Evaluation Report (PIER) dated August <br /> 18, 1994. <br /> Groundwater Technology has maintained dear lines of communication with the San Joaquin County <br /> representative, Mr. Steve Sasson, through frequent correspondence (multiple phone calls and letters <br /> dated September 13, 1994, October 6, 1994, November 29, 1994 and January 27, 1995) to convey the <br /> status and schedule of environmental work at the Site. Until recently (January 12, 1995), we have been <br /> assured that the Site was in compliance with San Joaquin County directives. In fact, in my most recent <br /> conversation with Mr. Sasson (February 1, 1995) he confirmed that he had no idea what would have <br /> prompted him to communicate the Site's lack of compliance to the State Water Board when he was well <br /> OQ53span.nr <br /> Offices throughout the U.S Canada and Oumeat <br />