|
'� "4" '.'1' a - $i F . "^`�� uTMR^'ate' ". ~%�s'."" F"F-.�... .�.'Z" ..� _ '�.' h '� I•. ..
<br /> Ye _
<br /> e ^* e.;,`� `Y=K i.- .x _ ''• 'Y' 'r'*t' '- x'7k Yom? r
<br /> yi - w r
<br /> 12:November 16 41
<br /> 2004 °' _-
<br /> " sr,
<br /> AGE NC Project No 960254jr
<br /> Y„ �sr— -sem
<br /> Page 2 of3 �; y- -
<br /> { = -
<br /> ..�.F^ g - } .. - -Yrr�•-rte , VN
<br /> i.
<br /> a
<br /> - - ACTUAL"C( STS FORsSOI-L,F -_MEDIATIC}N;.A41
<br /> CTIWITIE AND FUItTDREIMEUR E I `
<br /> - _
<br /> �, ���� ��....- w "`- 4•
<br /> Costs for the excavation and,disposal cif thy1;400 cubtc;-yards 'o6� , it toWed approxirna#ely _
<br /> = $ _{}00th gOn Ite�rriburserrterit Re[��y+west jrR \y I'�Tc 5 "the:Underg�7rrouhd Storage"Tonic Cleanuy�F,uiiti
<br /> 3 ..3 . `1'. \_. /z ..: a ay b g k: Pi aC
<br /> " (US fCF}indicated that onl 71°fo of the,cyst would I�edeetned elt able based u oti the ort mall
<br /> " props seel excavation volume`(I;OOC}cubic yards)versus the actual excavation�volurne(1,40{7 cubic
<br /> , r-:w�
<br /> '° = -yards) The USTCF provided the following `c r�tnbte'=on
<br /> the F4ytrtent Suint iary for=RFS #5 rand, f r
<br /> q ,ry y�
<br /> "'17� .JtiSetU�it1t 1�,3\.it .c --r`r f `''t.- 'i'i3r„ k., . ` '•�,
<br /> 4 ,_..� ""•�'� a� -�.�".�*;,'�+�� � 4. t '' i r t.,.,}� e.7 q�G^� £.y ::� 'pa's � -r dR.. ,+.
<br /> yam' , The approved Remedial Action Vo'kplan and-addendum proposed;tire•exavati6n,of'1 QOQ cubic yards of
<br /> ympat t.sa l cci►rduigtc►"tflo' exuavafaon surnrhary;the'actuai volume of hycirir rbvn impacted soil excavated
<br /> diS ,� d was¢I iDO ubt+c yards Only 7 %(I QQQ/14QQ 3 0Q1 of thex oats yvltrch . the.pTopbsecl and
<br /> Pr PM
<br /> isnade elig�bie T#ie re'mairiirig casts are�peniing pr4�or=lo subiSiittalt�fthe excar�atiorfroport
<br /> M
<br /> war : PP . , t - .. Q ...
<br /> - Althou -aitai�itcal:iesults wree submitted,there is-•insttffcien#`sam lmg.-de tlisancl7ocafiivns=t�ietetune
<br /> 410-4,�<whq er excavation'bf rhe a kt�onat #QQ cubic yards was necessary 0M asonatile ani necessai�+_a��ligible'
<br /> retrntsur$�m"i t per incl gulatiun 1 utliermore,the Fund will iffiQ e,the vst cost effect ye rbrrective
<br /> - +.�,;;°�� actiq Th Ift itnountsumtttetl;.6 ehfnbursement assoicated with the'excavatii n;disposal;b Cki fling andF�a'
<br /> compacti4j,includi ig well aba iiiv hAf-ghd replacement was$187, 3'! 82(1ine,ltems; `tlirtt 12) Due to the
<br /> • `� - added cost v#=eticavatjng'tieyone what wus originally prop§ed,the corrective action chosen hoes not appear tar,
<br /> "1 s .a
<br /> ` -�- a be=the antisti:costed-effec�ve based tin;the'comiarr�sarirothe.remediaticin alternatives included.. `ltie:CAi' Wit=
<br /> xY
<br /> ig Sechc�n81 2(ej of the Fund regulations states tlint.tlie added costss;of tmplemei�ting a cortctive actloh
<br /> alternative that isnot the most cost effective alternative to Ad ie, clea n 9evels„identified as`necess li tfie
<br /> _ - :p y r.
<br /> regulatory=agency.are ineligeble for rermburseinen�t Stfrinbtt a copy of the regalafitry,:agency
<br /> directive for...
<br /> z y xceeding;tl scope o work ori inaily�{}]�i i�7ro,ed'° " A '` •;
<br /> Ciptes of the I'aytnen Smmartesfrom RR#S and _# ar ;attacled Adclitianal infcrmatitn has
<br /> l
<br /> beenprcivided toheJSTCF,;trtt hdingpyf the_Excavation rzd Smpin�g Deport, copies of _' d
<br /> detailed Any i es,,,a 47 qp shawtngAhe excavated-and re rfac6d areas and a brief arra�ive M work `
<br /> ` which is attached - -,,
<br /> .._mac. •--:�__.'..es -
<br /> c M,..L,.t '� c y2�,--s�c•c.- s. 3:. - },-w
<br /> :fi+e^.'i."*'^• .- +`s y - -: ,, r : yr _ t....- '_ r' yt ._- .r. :_c = er
<br /> .r As=stated pt the=Payment Suiumary for RR# ,the USTCF.does not=consrcier the excava#tctn wc�rlt
<br /> complete at`the site to be tiie most"cosi-effective' Hctever based upon the original:estunate of
<br /> $15(1,fl00o$200,000{ 1 (}to$20CI per cubic yard}#fire total costs a roxnatel�-j$10`t} is sailer s
<br /> { we61uwtthfrt those esitinates even wit Qut considering the additional 400 cubic yards of 966 excavated
<br /> and Fetnove'd ,, -
<br /> �. r . Aw
<br /> -
<br /> „�_ - mar.ys.�?• �-"�• '� �{. � C �r �f
<br /> h , As you are aware,t fur C ibhf YX
<br /> ,' toe Toste,would not Have authorized the additional costs v�iithout
<br /> .ti
<br /> 4SJCEHD approrralitf#he addtt a1°scope of 4k:-Itisour understandttig that yhu con' ted the
<br /> USTCF during-excavacan,disoussed the iiPportunity,t continue excavaticrt an .recetvecl a verbal. 4
<br /> appioval.forthe addttxcana wark�A's�ue•have,.discussed nertfi tlse JCEHD:riorAfrE:w_ould have
<br /> _ -
<br /> advocated the aditl nEl-wo_kt if the lS TF were not amenable tc rettizbursement of-addttinal y
<br /> : r 1 }'� -3:,$r 7� .. -s - -tri _ , -+•,, •+:3 -
<br /> �.
<br /> 3, `-a" "', 1, :r-..: .-Ys _ '-„2',. t'ar.: $- •a.
<br /> t -`,.•• st •c �r -�` rs-�.. 4 '..... t.3• " 3..'.'s 0-
<br /> € �' ,•-
<br /> 4 t s R 3 4dvanced oiOiri6tntiii; nc -
<br /> - t i ;
<br /> .,y 'G- w*s ,y;k's s"".,.,`�-, r,at -.i.*t--- s;w--e r�_ x' ,»-at�•,� "".,y4..'¢j `.,s r - r e i. ,c '' - -4,
<br /> r '. xr =1� s -+" g _ �-4 y. a •�.'�,• 'u.- � ''' �. '�' 'y-� s` ".i' *� � -e ,y �'4�.,.d' 'lh+
<br /> .,±',:, 1"5 �� ""T' .` t ,. `�'' _ya'^5;,.`' Rj. _ f � ..;.,• .r c,� t�.��£•...5.��,.a kx2 "'fr' '°�i�;,�..arm .{". .-° ^'. h:e � �°s••-�j ,ET t f
<br />
|