|
� �3911
<br /> Nil'
<br /> .^�_z.-.5...os.:::--.-.':._ q:�a�rRc.,l�trr;s�a..% .. '<;���.u �`�.,..`,�z.";.:�.3.'§�r�v•.T�,"..°'�_....;:.�,•:y�„�>,'a-fi�,��xh'�gu^�-su'``g x :e2a"a�`.'.�yt"-"','5�=,-.;,.,.*Y.pr""�"+�a3,���,�"a^;��y�'-'�,�'�"`�'�.�t,-.�*.r)��.+x,.�an'�,+t�*'*���"?P.�y�'.'",��,``t°«�'7:>I,".e'V-I-`^��Er��'3VTH,�si=-k;'S-#�U' M�;m�4„x�A'�1'�1-�t��"`;.•,`,.z. .<-`�'4 ,,3-=,��'�rc ro,'-S-:_:;.�,3�rc„w
<br /> tfO.,b.-. .:.-r,.,.�xs x .�. J -:•.^:. ,G i ✓ '-°+
<br /> x Rene tNo,r�.^ 'S x`; .• . '� • �.^. -.,.�w: � - w��4 �, x rA c.x�� t"'���' � � t r�,_c� s ^'�?�T=x::
<br /> .,,- .�;' '`"-c :;:.a � - .: -..�. - .---5"-°. �.., 'i". .,�., 3"`�f r+������.:.+,.. ��� ..,;>.,c.. ;:... ' b�" .^,� ' '�„,._;u � - � x �7 .,.« a. �` r.k%•-.'a+�" �r..
<br /> invoice Invoice Amount Eligible at USTCF Spreadsheet
<br /> I No. Bate Requested Eligible Third Party Pending melt ible Notes Comments
<br /> 111,531.26 w _ z< -
<br /> �eviottsTota{{�asfrReimbursemertt).
<br /> 1 -"6713 .12131102 1 460.00 460.00 0.00
<br /> .26913 02120/031 530.00 530.00 0.00
<br /> 3 7051 021,28103 1 1230.00 1230.00 0.00
<br /> 4 r 12/03:.1 3,357:00 3357:00' 0-00
<br /> 5 x-724 I.J.7 1,365.00 1385:00 000
<br /> 6
<br /> ,wti fi 06130103 3,822.75 3822;75 0.00
<br /> 7 .... :/7429 06/301031. 33,011-90 23438.45 1 9573!45 0.00 A,246
<br /> 1,3 06130!03 47.843.29 330if,72r 13874.55 0.00 A,2,46
<br /> 9
<br /> -17431 06/30/03': . 40,824.47 28985.37 11,839,10 0.00 A,2,48
<br /> 40 017478 07116/03` 5,659.94 5559:94 0.00
<br /> .11 03-152 0711.1103 36594.00 36,594,00 0.00 111,46
<br /> 12 03447 06/27103 `19582.47 1 19.582.47 0.00 B 1,46 fi
<br /> 13 _ 0.00
<br /> 14 0.00
<br /> 15 1 0.00
<br /> =N ,: r ,; a, r oa'o t s e nest
<br /> iv$214,348.51 $0.00 claimant will carry these amounts forward to next"Spreadsheet"as"Amount Requested,Previous Total"
<br /> and"Third Patty Casts"columns.
<br /> f
<br /> Section 2812;1.(b)requires three bids for any work after December 2,1991,or cost eligibility maybe compromised,
<br /> FENDING COSTS t
<br /> Costs thathave been categorized as pending may be substantiated at a Eater time with a future reimbursement request and do not require an appeal in order for
<br /> staff to complete the eligibility review. However,additional information is required because documentation in the file is insufficient and/or inadequate to make a
<br /> reasonable and necessary cost determination(Article 4,Section 2812.2(a),Petroleum USTCF Regulations),Costs"pending"additional information will
<br /> be reevaluated once requested supporting documentation is submitted to the Fund with a future reimbursement request. Please note,the above"pending"costs
<br /> area result of insufficient information submitted. Following submittal of additional information,should the eligibility review determine that the cost(s)and
<br /> associatedactivihr(s)are unreasonable and unnecessary,the cost(s)will be made ineligible.
<br /> FOOTNOTES
<br /> A)The approved Remedial Action Workplan and addendum proposed the excavation of 1,000 cubic yards of impacted soil.According to the excavation summary.the actual volume of hydrocarbon-
<br /> impacted soil excavated and disposed was 1,400 cultic yards.Only 71%(1 0 0011 400 x 100)of the costs which is the proposed and approved portiort is made eligible;The remaining costs are
<br /> pending prior to submittal of the excavation report. Although analytical results were submitted,there is Insufficient information such as sampling depths and 10001116ris to determine ,
<br /> whether excavation of the additional 400 cubic yards was necessary.Only reasonable and necessary costs are eligible for reimbursement per Find regulattons.FurtFiemrore;the Fund
<br /> will reimburse the most cast effective corrective action.The total amount submitted for reimbursement associated with the excavation,disposal,backfillinq.and compacting including
<br /> well abandonment and replacement was$187;338.82(line items 6 thru 12).Due to the added cost of excavating beyondwhat was originally proposed,thB corrective action chosen:does
<br /> not appear,to be the most cost effective based on the cost comparison of the remediation alternatives included in the CAP.Section 2812:2(e)of the Fund regulations states that the
<br /> the added costs of implemenfinga corrective action alternative that is not the most cost-effective alternative to achieve cleanup levels identified as necessary.6y the`r�ulatory agency
<br /> are ineligible for reimbursement:Submit a copy of the regulatory agency's directive for exceeding the scope of work originally proposed.
<br /> B)Thistx}st is for compacltng and.repaving a total of 9,600 sq,feet.The total area proposed and approved for excavation was 5.100 sq,feet: Provide ti site map'showing the repaved:area:and
<br /> justificationfor ngtho;proposed original area for paving;Furthermore,please explain these additional costs for backfilling and ctympacting(100166#7431(line Unr#9)also
<br /> includes costs labor and material for backSiiling and?compacting.Refer to'footnote'A regarding'ineligibility of the added costs of implementing a corrective action alternative that is
<br /> not tharrtost'cost effective.Also provide a breakdown of the cost by labor and materials:
<br /> 1).SUFFICIENT DETAIL REGARDING COSTS AND ACTIVITIES
<br /> Payrrx tit for this invoice cannot be authorized at this time since'sufficient detailed documentation regarding costs and activities was not provided. inkirmaddh deitgiiftig ttoud meny hours)Units were
<br /> e%tierMed'performing specific activities needs to be provided'. Please refer to the Reimbursement Request instruction package,and the USTGF Gostl3uidelines for exampies of Nmetypes bf'information
<br /> betrtg requested to support this cost for payment.
<br /> 2) LACKING DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION
<br /> There was not sufficient descriptive information to support this invoice for payment. To support this invoice for payment,the following must be inciudedwith your requi gf it payment:
<br /> 1)a brief narrative describing the specific activities conducted,;2):copies of any correspondence to and from the locaf regulator,and 3)copies of any technical reports and workpians,including all
<br /> maps,figures,and tables.
<br /> .46)REGULATORY DIRECTION OF WORK CONDUCTED '
<br /> Based on the supplied documentation,it is not apparent that the activities conducted had regulatory approval prior to:the work being initiated. Per Fund Regulation:Section 2811(a)(5),the claimant
<br /> must provide documentation that the activities were performed'in accordance with the oral or written directives of the appropriate regulatory agency and wll0shy permits obtained to conduct the work
<br /> described. Documentation needs to be provided before payment can be authorized for this invoice that all work performed tied prior regulatory approval.
<br />
|