Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Laurie Cotulla V %00 <br /> July 25, 1989 <br /> Page 7 <br /> y,, Analytical results for the soil samples indicate that EPA Method 8020 constituents exceeding <br /> the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) designated levels in waste or <br /> soils for the protection of groundwater [(designated levels) as presented in "The Designated <br /> y Level Methodology for Waste Classification and Cleanup Level Determination" Marshack, <br /> Jon B., April 1987] were only identified in sample ATR-4B from 10.5 to 11.0 feet in borehole <br /> ATR-4. Sample ATR-4B contained 2.2 parts per million (ppm) benzene. With a laboratory <br /> .L. detection limit of 10 ppm, three of the seven soil samples contained identifiable amounts of <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons with EPA Method 8015, modified. Samples ATR-2B (10.0 to 10.5 <br /> feet), ATR-313 (10.0 to 10.5 feet), and ATR-4B contained 710 ppm, 1,300 ppm, and 1,700 <br /> ppm petroleum hydrocarbons, respectively. With a detection limit of 0.01 ppm, no EPA <br /> Method 8010 constituents were identified in any of the soil samples. <br /> In April 1987, EPA Method 602 identified benzene, toluene, and xylene exceeding DHS action <br /> levels (Marshack, 1987) in groundwater samples collected from wells ATR-3 and ATR-4. <br /> Xylene was identified in well ATR-1 and toluene was identified in well ATR-2; however, the <br /> concentrations were well below DHS action levels. Lead was identified in the groundwater <br /> samples from the four wells. It exceeded the RWQCB primary drinking water standard for <br /> lead of 0.05 ppm in wells ATR-2 and ATR-3. Petroleum hydrocarbons were identified (EPA <br /> Method 8015) in wells ATR-3 and ATR-4 at concentrations of 17 and 21 ppm, respectively. <br /> Petroleum hydrocarbons were not identified in wells ATRA and ATR-2 based on a detection <br /> limit of 1.0 ppm. With the exception of 1,2-Dichloroethane, none of the EPA Method 602 <br /> constituents exceeded RWQCB primary drinking water standards. Groundwater from wells <br /> ATR-2 and ATR-3 contained 1,2-Dichloroethane at concentrations of 5.9 and 20 ppm, <br /> respectively. The RWQCB primary drinking water standard for 1,2-Dichloroethane is 5.0 ppm. <br /> 4.0 In Brown and Caldwell's September 28, 1987 PAR, the following conclusions were presented: <br /> 1. No floating product was found at this site. <br /> La <br /> 2. The lateral extent of hydrocarbon contamination in soil and groundwater was not <br /> defined. <br /> 3. It is unlikely that a nearby municipal well would be affected by hydrocarbons in <br /> groundwater at this site because the well is approximately 114 miles away, not <br /> t. downgradient from the ARCO site, and draws water from a deeper aquifer. <br /> 4. The soils at the locations of the on-site wells do not contain significant levels of <br /> hydrocarbons. Therefore, excavation, on-site soil aeration, soil venting, off-site soil <br /> treatment, and landfilling are unnecessary. <br /> 5. From the hydrocarbon levels identified in the groundwater and the fact the tanks and <br /> lines appear to be structurally sound, it is thought the hydrocarbons originated from <br /> overfilling the tanks. <br /> 4+ <br /> La <br />_ BROWN AND CALDWELL <br /> V 723 S STREET SACRAMENTO,CALIFORNIA 95814-7092•(916)444-0123 <br />