Laserfiche WebLink
URS <br /> • Mr Harlin Knoll Page 3 <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department <br /> ARCO 2093 <br /> February 24, 2005 <br /> gasoline (TPHg) concentrations were not reported above laboratory detection limits Maximum concen- <br /> trations of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) were reported in the soil samples from <br /> ATR-7 at 93 ppb, 182 ppb, 31 ppb, and 177 ppb, respectively The soil analytical results for this investi- <br /> gation are summarized in Attachment D <br /> Groundwater samples were taken from the three new monitoring wells after their installation in March <br /> 1989 Maximum concentrations of TPHg and BTEX were reported in the groundwater samples collected <br /> from ATR-5 at 220 ppm, 693 ppb, 327 ppb, less than 5 ppb, and 7 ppb, respectively Groundwater <br /> analytical results for this investigation are summarized in Attachment D <br /> Supplemental Site Investigation-(October 1990) <br /> A supplemental site investigation was completed at the request of the RWQCB by Brown and Caldwell <br /> in October 1990 to further define the lateral extent of soil and groundwater contamination both on-site <br /> and off-site Five boreholes (ATR-9, ATR-10, ATR-12, BH-1, and BH-2) were drilled, and monitoring <br /> wells were completed in three of the boreholes In addition, a groundwater extraction well was installed <br /> (TEX-1)to provide a means of conducting an aquifer test <br /> Soil samples collected from the boreholes (except from TEX-1) were analyzed The following maximum <br /> concentrations were reported benzene less than 50 mg/kg, ethylbenzene less than 50 mg/kg, toluene <br /> less than 50 mg/kg, xylenes 270 mg/kg, and TPHg 1,300 mg/kg Soil analytical results for this <br /> investigation are presented in Attachment E <br /> Groundwater samples were collected in October 1990 from all 10 monitoring wells None of the off-site <br />�f wells contained detectable concentrations of TPHg or BTEX compounds TPHg and BTEX compounds <br /> were identified in three of the on-site wells Groundwater analytical results from this sampling effort are <br /> surrunarized in Attachment E <br /> Under round Storage Tank Removal and Soil Sampling 1993 <br /> Four single-wall gasoline USTs and associated piping were removed and replaced with four double- <br /> wall, fiberglass USTs and double-containment piping by Roux Associates from July through September <br /> 1993 All of the tanks that were removed appeared to be in good condition The new USTs were <br /> t installed in the same general area of the site as the former USTs <br /> Prior to the installation of the new USTs, eight soil samples were collected from the sidewalls of the <br /> tank cavity excavation, and five soil samples were collected from the bottom of the product line <br /> trenches Sample locations and tabulated analytical results for this effort are presented in Attachment F <br /> During the UST removal activities, approximately 1,000 yards of contaminated soil were stockpiled on- <br /> site for disposal Analytical results for the 15 samples collected from stockpiled soil are presented in <br /> Attachment F <br />�1 K 1WprocessV5 BP ARCo1020931Closure Report\Draft of 2093 Closure Report doc. <br />