My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
TRACY
>
3788
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545739
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2020 12:21:11 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 12:11:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0545739
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0006002
FACILITY_NAME
UNION OIL #6348
STREET_NUMBER
3788
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
TRACY
STREET_TYPE
BLVD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
21225002
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
3788 N TRACY BLVD
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
164
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
id <br /> December 10, 1994 <br /> Kathleen Gayner Deutsch na IV (� <br /> 13655 Dunbar Road �J <br /> Dundee MI. 48131 <br /> ' DD"', 14. 1994 <br /> Mr. Harlin Knoll ENVIRONMENTALHEALTH <br /> Senior REHS, Site Mitigation Unit PERMITISERV ICES <br /> San Joaquin County Public Health Service <br /> P.O. Box 388 <br /> Stockton, CA. 95201-0388 <br /> Re: Site Remediation, Site Code 41419, Unocal SS# 6348, Tracy, CA, <br /> Dear Mr. Knoll, <br /> It appears from the enclosed correspondence, that Mr. Ed Ralston of Unocal is going to- <br /> request your office for full groundwater sign-offs on the above site. <br /> As you will note from my most recent letter to Unocal, we are by no means suggesting <br /> that this course of action be followed. Unocal is by now fully aware of what we regard as <br /> being a fully remediated site and of the completeness of sign-offs they require to achieve <br /> this end. To this regard, there is still the question of the scope of the initial investigation,- <br /> which <br /> nvestigation,which I am confident you and the RWQCB will resolve at the December 14, meeting . <br /> We have no objection to a limited, clearly defined, post-remediation monitoring <br /> period, but only after the site has received full closure and is regarded by your <br /> department and RWQCB as fully mitigated. We also request Unocal relocate MW3A <br /> to a less intrusive location to allow development. This, of course requires your approval, <br /> as the integrity of all monitoring points has been addressed in your.previous <br /> correspondence with Unocal'. <br /> Mr. Ralston states he is prepared to move expeditiously to obtain final approval from <br /> SJCPHS and RWQCB to remove all monitoring wells from the property ----so is <br /> relocating MW3A an option for consideration??? Can this well be located closer to the <br /> northerly property line, retaining its approximate N.E.bearing to detect any residual <br /> contaminant plume from the historic UST site------and still maintain the integrity of a <br /> monitoring program???? <br /> As requested during your last phone conversation with my husband, I would appreciate <br /> minutes of the December 14th meeting and copies of any correspondence with Unocal, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.