My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
TRACY
>
3788
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545739
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/8/2020 12:21:11 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 12:11:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0545739
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0006002
FACILITY_NAME
UNION OIL #6348
STREET_NUMBER
3788
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
TRACY
STREET_TYPE
BLVD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
21225002
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
3788 N TRACY BLVD
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
164
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memorandum <br /> UN®CAL76 <br /> November 21, 1994 <br /> To: Ron Senner <br /> From: Ed Ralston <br /> S i t e R e m e d i a t i o n <br /> Unocal Service Station #6348 <br /> Tracy, California <br /> As per your request, this letter is provided in response to Ms. Deutsch's letter of <br /> October 24, 1994, in which she questioned certain aspects of the scope and <br /> thoroughness of the site remediation undertaken at Unocal Service Station #6348, in <br /> Tracy, California. <br /> Her letter raises three specific concerns which suggest that the site investigation, and <br /> therefore the site remediation, are possibly deficient. I will address these questions <br /> in the order in which she referred to them in her letter. For clarity and brevity, I will <br /> attempt to paraphrase each of the issues of raised. <br /> 1. Concern number one raises two points: <br /> • The proximity of the investigation and remediation to the "vacant lot" located <br /> to the east of the station proper. Her letter suggests that Mittelhauser <br /> Corporation's (Mittelhauser's) efforts to investigate or remediate were <br /> constrained by the presence of the temporary fence. <br /> e The June 1990 removal of a waste oil tank. She suggested that this removal <br /> was completed "without remediatlon. " <br /> Regarding the first point, I would refer Ms. Deutsch to the information provided in <br /> Mittelhauser's site remediation report of March 1994. A review of the figures, tables, <br /> and data contained in that report will demonstrate that the eastern extent of <br /> hydrocarbon impacted soils was reached, identified, and removed during the <br /> overexcavation of the storage tanks. The data supporting this conclusion includes the <br /> following: <br /> FORM 1.0007 GREY.8851 PRINTED IN U.S.A. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.