Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> 02 May 2002 <br />' AGE-NC Project No 98-0452 <br /> S Page 2 of 4 <br />' 3.0. PROCEDURES <br />' Quarterly ground water monitoring was performed on 29 March 2002 Field work was performed <br /> m accordance with the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board(CVRWQCB)and San <br /> Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (EHD) guidelines for investigations of <br />' underground storage tank (UST) sites and sampling ground water monitoring wells, respectively <br /> 3 1 MONITORING WELL PURGE PROCEDURES <br /> On 29 March 2002, a Sohnst water level meter was used to measure the depth to groundwater in the <br /> three wells relative to the tops of the well casings (well heads) The ground water elevations and <br /> gradient were determined from this data (Table 1) <br /> rAfter recording water level measurements, a dedicated disposable plastic bailer was used to purge <br /> each monitoring well of standing water Approximately 7 to 10 gallons of water were removed from <br /> each well(approximately 3 casing-water volumes) Ground water temperature, pH and conductivity <br /> were measured at regular intervals during the purge process using an Oakton water analyzer Field <br /> data sheets are included in Appendix A Purged water was stored on site in labeled, 55-gallon DOT- <br /> lie <br /> OT- <br /> 1• approved drurns <br /> Domestic well DW-1 was purged by opening the purge valve and allowing the holding tank to be <br /> emptied Following complete discharge of the holding tank the pump was allowed to operate for at <br /> least one minute and a sample was collected from the sampling port located on the supply line <br /> between the well head and the holding tank <br /> 3 2 COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> Following purging and allowing a minimum of 80% recovery of initial water volume in the wells, <br /> I water samples were collected from each purged well using new disposable plastic bailers <br /> Additionally, a water sample was collected from domestic well DW-1 Each water sample was <br /> transferred into laboratory-supplied 40-m1 VOA vials containing 0 5 ml 18% hydrochloric acid as <br /> I a sample preservative After collection, the samples were properly labeled, placed in a chilled <br /> container and transported under cham-of-custody to McCambell Analytical Laboratories, Inc and <br /> were analyzed for <br /> • TPH-g and TPH-d in accordance with EPA Method 8015 Modified, and <br /> • Oxygenated fuel additives-MTBE,tertiary butyl alcohol(TBA), di-isopropyl ether(DIPE), <br /> ethyl tertiary butyl ether(ETBE), and tertiary amyl methyl ether(TAME)in accordance with <br /> . EPA Method 8260 Modified <br /> IAdvanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />