Laserfiche WebLink
UM <br /> Effiww <br /> 'C.# :5r.''Fry ?�'F"`'+""qr rrz`�, �� E;;55 �'tsF r" �}i t.�. e'rs,' r 'a .# iZ"" ^-_^•crc� raai"vn�. �s> },) #e_. r; - <br />`u%- ..ir' nrl?eV r .vr_lahv?" n". .a•: ,acv �.f, � .H. v£" = <br /> Su ' $ � F rya F"�_ c_ :, �� <br /> ci. <br /> si"..ghtly muddywale' were recovered and the well bailed dry. <br /> SarRples were taken r covered. pHlWasn. <br /> a4.59tand rTemp. 62.about Ode- <br /> and had partially <br /> G:eBS F. <br /> well <br /> 270. 2, };e southerly well near the entrance ramp to the <br /> pit, was bailed and sampled last. Water was located at <br /> 27.55' and well bottom at 32 .45' from toe. 4. 6 gallons of <br /> fairly clean, <br /> reddish tinged water was recovered before s <br /> bailing dry. 5 times Water in the 4 fele g. �ou5amp]eabWere taken <br /> t 5 <br /> gallons. pH was 5}27 and Temp. partially recovered. <br /> after the we 11 water leva1 had P Y <br /> Operations were completed at 1 :45 PN• <br /> on April 14, 1990, Richard Thorpe and a surveyor re- <br /> established well head elevations on all wells. These new <br /> ion of 50wa <br /> elevations are used below. asedsup �nea elevat <br /> steelmarker in, <br /> thes <br /> used as a base elevation, b <br /> blacktop entrance, and a USGS Quad topographic map. <br /> pE'SULTS OF TESTS OF MONITORING WELL WATER <br /> As Specified by DHS <br /> Table 1 : <br /> ND 0.50 mg/l EPA 8015 <br /> ii 1 : TPH-Diesel 0, 0 mg/1 EPA 8015 9r, <br /> I,iW 2: TPH-Diesel ND 0.50 mg/1 EPA 8015 <br /> ]iW 3: <br /> TPH-Diesel ND <br /> The Canonie Labs report is appended. <br /> r These tests, along with all previously reported, show that <br /> the groundwater had not been contaminated by the leaking <br /> tank. <br /> WATER SURFACE AND SLOPE <br /> :figure 1 herein was Ana�lmostfrom <br /> flatthe <br /> water. tableGroundwater <br /> isTechnology <br /> shown. <br /> Report of 5/25/8°• represent a <br /> Differences as small as these do not necessarily P <br /> regional slope direction at all , these data could be die <br /> resentative of the area, but owing to the lack of gradient <br /> found, one can't be sure. <br /> Table 2 <br /> of the <br /> imeasurements <br /> !hese dx'acarea tabulation <br /> ion to a commonelevation (50'assummedtatt <br /> above. <br /> -driveway) has been made. <br /> N- 3 <br /> Ei . +50.92' E1 +36.18 ' WL' <br /> -42.13, <br /> -2755 <br /> WL -40.00' WL. <br />