Laserfiche WebLink
Hv <br /> i <br /> EPA method 8020, and total petroleum hydrocarbons as <br /> + gasoline (TPHG) and as diesel (TPHD) by DOHS LUFT <br /> Methodology. <br /> The locations of the three discrete soil samples and one <br /> composite sample collected during re-excavation of the <br /> diesel tank pit are shown on Figure 3. The laboratory <br /> results of these samples are summarized on Table, 1. The <br /> F laboratory data sheets and chain-of-custody documentation <br /> for these samples are contained in Appendix ix. <br /> All the excavated soil was transported to an approved <br /> ° disposal facility. The excavation was backfilled to grade <br /> with clean material. <br /> 3.2 Phase 2 <br /> To provide a preliminary indication of the extent of waste <br /> oil contamination and to provide necessary assurances to <br /> lessees. WaterWork proposed the drilling of one vertical <br /> soil boring/well and one angle soil boring. On February 12, <br /> 1990 a vertical soil boring was drilled to a depth of S0 <br /> feet below grade to be completed as a groundwater monitoring <br /> well (MW1). Because of limited access due to the open tank <br /> pit excavation,the fenced property line and the size of the <br /> drill rig, the drilling of the the angle boring was not <br /> completed on this date. <br /> Drilling of the vertical boring (B-1/MW1) was conducted with <br /> a B-61 rig using eight inch diameter (O.D. ) hollow-stem <br /> augers. The drilling was performed under the direction of a <br /> field geologist who maintained a continuous log of the <br /> material encountered using the Unified Soil Classification <br /> System (Appendix III). The well boring was located as close <br /> as possible to the suspected source of soil contamination on <br /> the eastern end of the former u/g waste oil tank. <br /> Slight <br /> diesel odor was noted in this boring between 14 and and ZO <br /> feet below grade. <br /> The well was constructed of two a.nch diameter flush threaded <br /> _ F480 PVC screen/casing. No glues or solvents were used in <br /> well construction. Monterey silica sand (#3) was placed in <br /> the annular space around the 0.020 inch slotted screen. A <br /> two foot bentonite seal was placed above the sandpack prior <br /> to surface sealing with neat cement. Specific well <br /> construction derails are presented in Appendix III. The <br /> location of the monitoring well is shown on Figure 3. The <br /> drill cuttings were stored on an asphalt surface adjacent to <br /> the former tank pit. <br /> Depth to groundwater was measured in accordance with <br /> Waterworks Groundwater Monitoring Protocol (Appendix IV). <br /> Depth to groundwater was measured at 33.35 below grade on <br /> February 13, 1990 and 33.82 on April 4, 1990. <br /> 3 <br />