Laserfiche WebLink
ME <br /> 7-Eleven, Inc. <br /> Ethan Valburg <br /> Direct Dial Number(714)253-6491 <br /> Via Email Delivery <br /> October 5, 2019 <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Division <br /> 1868 E Hazelton Ave <br /> Stockton, CA 95205 <br /> Attn: Paul Nso <br /> Re: 7-Eleven Store No.: 19976 <br /> 1399 N. Main St. <br /> Manteca, CA 95336 <br /> Inspection Report <br /> Dear Mr. Nso: <br /> The intent of this letter is to respond to the item(s) you noted on your Inspection Report issued to <br /> the location referenced above dated 09/05/2019. <br /> Item 1: On your inspection report you noted that the current monitoring plan was not approved <br /> by the EHD. You requested that the TLS-350 be changed to the TLS-350Plus. <br /> Resolution 1: The changes to the monitoring plan were submitted in CERS on 09/19/19. <br /> Item 2: On your inspection report you noted that the overfill prevention equipment inspection <br /> was performed on 10/11/18 but submitted on 1/7/19. You requested that 7-Eleven, Inc. take all <br /> necessary precautions to ensure testing and submittal of test reports are performed in a timely <br /> manner. <br /> Resolution 2: 7-Eleven discussed this matter with Tanknology to determine the reasoning for <br /> the delayed submittal. In Tanknology's response they stated that they, "fell behind reviewing the <br /> first batch of overfill inspections working to insure we had the proper forms (new CA form), tank <br /> charts and procedures required by the state and local agencies. This has become SOP at this <br /> time with none of those original delays. " Tanknology believes their process changes should <br /> ensure no overfill test report will be submitted past the due date moving forward. <br /> Item 3: On your inspection report you noted that a copy of an approved monitoring plan was not <br /> available for inspection. You requested that an approved copy of a monitoring plan be submitted. <br /> Resolution 3: The changes to the monitoring plan were submitted in CERS on 09/19/19 and a <br /> copy was printed and placed onsite by the RGECS on 09/30/19. <br /> Item 4: On your inspection report you noted that a current response plan approved by the EHD <br /> was not found onsite. You requested that an approved copy of these plans be placed onsite. <br />