My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0013423
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
COUNTYWIDE
>
0
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
GP-92-14
>
SU0013423
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2020 8:46:54 AM
Creation date
6/12/2020 8:24:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0013423
PE
2600
FACILITY_NAME
GP-92-14
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
COUNTYWIDE
ENTERED_DATE
6/10/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
0 COUNTYWIDE
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Item No. 3 <br /> PC: 1-7-93 <br /> GP-92-1428-92-17 <br /> Page 7 <br /> 1. What physical, social, or economic factors exist that were not considered at the time of General <br /> Plan adoption and the evaluation of the proposal based on this new information. <br /> • The uses within the areas proposed for change are existing and were mistakenly not <br /> recognized on the General Plan and zoning maps. <br /> 2. Existing reasonable aftemative sites in the vicinity that are planned for the use and can <br /> accommodate the proposal. <br /> • This criteria does not apply to this General Plan Amendment, since most of the areas <br /> proposed for change are currently developed. <br /> 3. The potential for the proposal to establish an undesirable, growth-inducing precedent. <br /> • No changes in the existing uses are proposed. <br /> 4. The effect of the proposal on the fiscal health of the County. <br /> • No effects on the fiscal health of the County attributable to this project have been <br /> identified. <br /> All General Plan designations include density standards,function information,typical types, and locational <br /> criteria. The changes proposed are consistent with these items. <br /> In addition, Volume I includes an Implementation Measure that establishes the following criteria for use <br /> in the review of reclassifications: <br /> 1. Additional land is needed for urban development. <br /> • The proposal is for areas of existing development and does not provide a significant <br /> amount of additional land for urban development. <br /> 2. Adequate services can be made available for the development permitted in the zone. <br /> • No change in services is proposed for the existing development. <br /> 3. Approval of the proposal will not adversely affect the fiscal health of the County. <br /> • No effects attributable to this project have been identified. <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: <br /> An Initial Study was prepared for this item on November 25, 1992. On the basis of that study, a proposed <br /> Negative Declaration was prepared, and a Certificate of Fee Exemption with a 'De Minimus Impact <br /> Finding' has been prepared which states that the project will not have an adverse effect on wildlife <br /> resources. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.