My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0013430
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
COUNTYWIDE
>
0
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
TA-88-7
>
SU0013430
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2020 8:27:45 AM
Creation date
6/12/2020 9:25:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0013430
PE
2600
FACILITY_NAME
TA-88-7
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
COUNTYWIDE
ENTERED_DATE
6/10/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
0 COUNTYWIDE
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SAN JOAOUIN COUNTY <br /> ;'oma c°Z DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND BUILDING INSPECTION <br /> 1810 E. HAZELTON AVE., STOCKTON, CA 95205 CHET DAYISSON <br /> • r•. -3120 Director <br /> PLANNING PHONE: 209/468 <br /> 4GICOR�` <br /> BUILDING PHONE: 209/468-3123 JERRY HERZICK <br /> April 7 , 70v8 <br /> 19 8 Deputy Director <br /> TOM WALKER <br /> Deputy Director <br /> Board of Supervisors <br /> Courthouse <br /> Stockton, CA <br /> Dear Board Members: <br /> PLANNING TITLE TEXT AMENDMENT NO. TA-88-7 (ALL DISTRICTS ) <br /> IT IS RECOMMENDED: <br /> That the Board of Supervisors: <br /> 1. Approve the Negative Declaration and instruct the <br /> Clerk to file a Notice of Determination; and <br /> 2. Approve Planning Title Text Amendment No. TA-88-7, based <br /> on the "Bases for Recommendation" given in the staff <br /> report. <br /> REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION: <br /> The proposed Text Amendment would enable the County to enter <br /> into a Development Agreement with a landowner or any other <br /> person having an equitable interest in land that is proposed <br /> for development. When processed concurrently with a General <br /> Plan Amendment or a Zone Reclassification, a Development <br /> Agreement could be used to restrict future uses of property. <br /> Currently, without a Development Agreement, no such restric- <br /> tions on the future uses of property can be imposed at the <br /> time of General Plan Amendments or Zone Reclassifications. <br /> Under a Development Agreement, the developer agrees to commit <br /> his property to specific uses, construct specific improve- <br /> ments, provide certain facilities and services, develop <br /> according to a specific time schedule, or make other <br /> commitments that the County might not otherwise be able to <br /> compel a developer to perform. In return, the County agrees <br /> i to base future land use decisions for the subject property on <br /> the rules, regulations and policies in effect at the time the <br /> Development Agreement was entered into. <br /> The Planning Commission heard this matter at its meeting of <br /> March 17, 1988. After considering all written and oral <br /> testimony, the Commission, by a vote of 6-0, recommended <br /> approval of the Planning Title Text Amendment. <br /> BOS LETTER PAGE 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.