Laserfiche WebLink
Item No. 1 <br /> PC: &12-93 <br /> TA-93-3 <br /> Page 2 <br /> acre parcel in the same zone would not be allowed to create a homesite parcel (since, based on the <br /> General Plan density criterion, he would need 40 acres before division could take place). Thus, farmers <br /> who have large parcels are rewarded in terms of the number of homesite parcels allowed, while farmers <br /> with small parcels are penalized. <br /> On July 6, 1993, the Ordinance Review Subcommitee of the Planning Commission met to discuss the <br /> issue of homesite parcels in commercial agricultural areas. The comments of various agencies, groups, <br /> and individuals were reviewed and discussed by the Subcommittee. After assessing the problem, the <br /> Subcommittee unanimously agreed that there should be no division of agricultural property for the <br /> purpose of creating separate saleable homesite parcels. They did agree, however, that the creation of <br /> `temporary' homesite parcels for financing purposes only should be permitted. The proposed Text <br /> Amendment expresses these opinions. <br /> As worded, the proposed Text Amendment would permit the creation of a 'temporary' homesite parcel <br /> in the AG zone, regardless of the size of the original parcel. However, such a homesite parcel could not <br /> be sold separately from the remainder of the farm (i.e.,the remainder parcel') unless a commercial lender <br /> forecloses on either the remainder parcel or the homesite parcel. Once the loan on the homesite parcel <br /> is repaid, the owner would be required to merge the homesite parcel with the remainder parcel, thus <br /> reconstituting the original parcel. During the period in which the 'temporary' homesite parcel exists, the <br /> remainder parcel would remain a nonbuildable site for(primary) single-family dwellings. A note indicating <br /> these restrictions would be recorded with the parcel map. <br /> Homesite parcels created under these conditions would still be subject to the limitations imposed by the <br /> General Plan. For example, 9 there is an existing (primary) residence on the property and an additional <br /> dwelling is proposed to be constructed on a*temporary`homesite parcel,the General Plan density of one <br /> (primary) dwelling for each 20 acres could not be exceeded. <br /> The proposed Text Amendment also proposes to eliminate the creation of even 'temporary' 10-acre <br /> homesite parcels from property under Williamson Act contract. Under the current regulations, saleable <br /> 10-acre homesite parcels created from property under the Williamson Act are permitted. However, <br /> 'temporary' two-to five-acre homesite parcels created from Williamson Act property would be permitted <br /> by the proposed ordinance, provided such parcels also comply with the provisions of the Williamson Act. <br /> GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY: <br /> The proposed changes in the Development Title would affect properties with a General Agriculture <br /> designation on the General Plan. Since these changes would help to preserve agricultural lands and <br /> reduce the introduction of noncompatible uses in agricultural areas,they are considered to be consisitent <br /> with the Objectives, Policies, and Implementation Measures of the General Plan. <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: <br /> The Environmental Initial Study prepared for the proposed Text Amendment concluded that the Text <br /> Amendment would not have a significant, adverse effect on the environment, nor a portential for any <br /> adverse effect, either individually or cumulatively, on wikJhfe resources. On this basis, a Negative <br /> Declaration and a California Department of Fish and Game Certificate of Fee Exemption have been <br /> prepared. <br />