Laserfiche WebLink
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> xa�•�o <br /> r y COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT <br /> 1810 E.HAZELTON AVE..STOCKTON,CA 952058232 <br /> ��GiaO"pier PHONE:2091468-3120 Fax:2091468.3163 <br /> September 27, 1994 <br /> Board of Supervisors <br /> Courthouse <br /> Stockton, CA 95202 <br /> Dear Board Members: <br /> APPEAL BY WILLIAM AND ANN POTTER OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL <br /> OF VARIANCE APPLICATION NO. VR-94-2 (FIFTH SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT) <br /> IT IS RECOMMENDED: <br /> That the Board of Supervisors uphold the Planning Commission's action and deny Variance Application <br /> No. VR-94-2 based on the inability to make Findings 1 and 2 as stated in the Staff Report. <br /> REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION: <br /> The Planning Commission heard this item at its regularly scheduled meeting of September 15, 1994. <br /> William Potter, spoke in favor of the project. No one spoke in opposition. <br /> After considering all oral and written testimony, the Commission voted 7-0 to deny Variance Application <br /> No. VR-94-2 due to the inability to make Findings 1 and 2 as stated in the Staff Report. <br /> On September 23, 1994, William Potter appealed the Planning Commission's action to the Board of <br /> Supervisors. <br /> Aooeal Statement No. 1 <br /> In his appeal, the applicant states: <br /> 'The Commission determined that Finding No. 1 (special circumstances) could not be made. The <br /> Commission found that the reasons cited do not relate to size, shape topography, location, or <br /> surroundings.' <br /> 'Applicant contends that these findings were incorrect, because there are special circumstances <br /> relating to the 'surroundings' of the property. The fact that there are many pre-existing, non- <br /> conforming residential parcels in the area does create a special circumstance, in that one major <br /> reason for the applicable zoning (separating incompatible uses) does not apply in this case. This <br /> creates special circumstances relating to the property's surroundings.' <br /> he applicant also asserts that the existing house will continue to be occupied by the same <br /> family;the remainder will continue to be farmed by the same family; and the owners are financially <br /> constrained from selling the remainder for another ten years. <br />