My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012646
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
V
>
VON SOSTEN
>
16555
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545795
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012646
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2020 5:43:17 PM
Creation date
6/15/2020 2:45:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012646
RECORD_ID
PR0545795
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0002952
FACILITY_NAME
LAMMERSVILLE SCHOOL
STREET_NUMBER
16555
STREET_NAME
VON SOSTEN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
20914009
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
16555 VON SOSTEN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
657
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�: <br /> Lammersville School District <br /> July 16, 1990 202/899.7004 <br /> 16 <br /> 2(located at the gasoline fuel dispensers location) revealed the presence of benzr le above the drinking <br /> water MCL, The groundwater samples collected from the remaining wells on site revealed the presence <br /> of trace concentrations of TPH-G;however, none of them contained BTEX above method detection limits <br /> (Figure 5), Conversely,the benzene plume in the groundwater appears to be localized in the vicinity of <br /> MW-2 and MW-6(Figure 6), The absence of BTEX in MW-s,MW-7,and MW-8 indicates the extent of the <br /> BTEX plume has been sufficiently defined to design a remediation strategy. Additionally,the distribution <br /> of BTEX in the groundwater indicates the source of the petroleum hydrocarbon leak to be the gasoline <br /> fuel dispensers and/or associated piping. Additionalsoil sampling and analysis will be necessaryto <br /> delineate the extent of petroleum hydrocarbons in the soil in this area. <br /> 9.0 REMEDIATION ALTERNATIVES <br /> Potential methods to clean up the groundwater beneath the site ate dictated largeiy by the dapth <br /> and extent of the petroleum hydrocarbon plume, and the subsurface geologic conditions. <br /> The remediation methods that were identified as possible alternatives for treatment of groundwater <br /> at the site were studied for the technical feasibility and cost effectiveness of each remediaf action. The <br /> treatment options that were studied included: <br /> v <br /> 1• No action, <br /> 2• Groundwater extraction and treatment, <br /> 3• In situ biodegradation- <br /> 9.1 NO ACTION <br /> Tne'no action'alternative would consist of a carefully designed monitoring and sampling program <br /> to monitor the natural attenuation of the levels of petroleum hydrocarbons. The natural breakdown of <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons in the subsurface through biodegradation and oxidation has been well <br /> documented in the literature. The rate of hydrocarbon migration at the site is slow. Accordingly, it may <br /> be possible to monitor the site and let natural processes eliminate the petroleum hydrocarbons without <br /> - posing any risk_to-the_environment,--A fate-and•transport model would be required to confirm this. A <br /> contingency plan would be developed.in the event that significant petroleum hydrocarbon migration <br /> occurs, <br /> GROU\U1lt1TER <br /> TECH\Y)LQCI••1\C. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.