Laserfiche WebLink
Geophysical UST Investigation AGS Project 13-084-1 CA <br /> Linden,California <br /> 2.0 RESULTS <br /> AGS detected a buried metal anomaly associated with two pavement cut patches; accordingly, AGS <br /> believes the anomaly represents the UST location. The anomaly footprint measures approximately 8 feet <br /> by 18 feet,which would equate to a 5,000-gallon UST;however,due to interference from buried utilities <br /> and the adjacent garage building,the anomaly exhibits a complex shape that does not readily indicate <br /> UST dimensions. In fact,the anomaly's bi-lobed nature suggests that two USTs might be present. AGS <br /> also detected a smaller area of more shallowly-buried metal within the large anomaly area. This smaller <br /> anomaly area measures approximately 4 feet by 7 feet, although it is worth noting that anomaly <br /> dimensions are usually larger than the footprint of the anomaly source object. A 4-by 7-foot anomaly <br /> represents a 500-gallon UST(or smaller),which is perhaps a more likely UST size considering the small <br /> garage building associated with the site. Investigation results are shown on Figures 2 and 3. <br /> Ground penetrating radar(GPR) was used to obtain more definitive information regarding UST size; <br /> however,no UST images were observed on the GPR records because the UST is buried deeper than the <br /> GPR signal penetration depth,which is estimated to be approximately three feet below ground surface at <br /> the Linden site. Several underground utilities were detected in the area,including natural gas,water,and <br /> telecommunications. <br /> 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION <br /> The investigation was performed within a 40-by 80-foot topographically flat,"L-shaped"area alongside <br /> the building at the corner of SR-26 and North Market Street(Figure 2). Two small cut-patches indicating <br /> former excavations were observed in the asphalt pavement,and AGS suspects that the target UST was <br /> encountered in one of the excavations. Although the site was free of surface obstructions,the building <br /> itself produced high levels of electromagnetic noise,as did the two underground utilities(natural gas and <br /> telecommunications) running through the survey area. <br /> 4.0 GEOPHYSICAL METHODS AND EQUIPMENT <br /> The geophysical investigation was performed using the following geophysical methods: <br /> • Time-domain Electromagnetics(EM), using a Geonics EM61 <br /> • Ground Penetrating Radar(GPR) using a GSSI SIR-3000 connected to a 400-MHz antenna <br /> • Electromagnetic metal detection(MD),using a Fisher TW-6 M-Scope <br /> • Radio-frequency utility locating using a RadioDetection Model RD-8000. <br /> Time-domain Electromagnetic Metal Detection (TDEM) <br /> The TDEM is a method commonly used to detect buried metallic objects at developed sites where surface <br /> metal objects, which can interfere with the geophysical measurements, are present. The TDEM <br /> instrument transmits a pulsed magnetic field, which causes (induces) small electrical currents (eddy <br /> currents) to flow through metallic objects near (below) the instrument. The strength of these eddy <br /> currents is measured by the TDEM receiver coil at a relatively long time after the magnetic field pulse <br /> subsides. This delayed measurement technique produces a reading that responds strongly to metal but <br /> p 2 ADVANCED GEOLOGICAL SERVICES <br />