Laserfiche WebLink
Geophysical UST Investigation AGS Project 13-084-ICA <br /> Linden,California <br /> variations (in millivolts) across the site (Figure 3). As part of the analysis, AGS looked for high- <br /> amplitude responses not readily attributable to known site features. Such responses are considered <br /> "anomalies"and are attributed to subsurface source bodies,which may include USTs, buried utilities, <br /> reinforced concrete foundations, and miscellaneous metallic debris. On the color contour maps, <br /> anomalies appear as "hot" (orange, red, and pink) colors representing areas with elevated EM61 <br /> measurements indicative of metallic objects. <br /> Because the EM61 was designed to produce a positive signal peak at the center of the metallic source <br /> body, it tends to produce anomalies with a shape and extent that approximates the footprint of the metal <br /> source object. Accordingly,AGS looked for rectangular anomalies with a footprint corresponding to the <br /> dimensions of the reported UST; however, it is worth noting that anomaly footprints are usually larger <br /> than that of the anomaly source body, and the footprint may also be distorted by nearby surface metal <br /> objects,underground utilities,and UST appurtenances. Anomaly amplitudes associated with USTs and <br /> similarly-sized metallic substructures depend on burial depth,but they are typically 200 millivolts(mV) <br /> or greater. <br /> AGS incorporated the site map into the EM61 contour map so that responses associated with surface <br /> metal objects and underground utilities could be identified and disregarded from consideration as a <br /> possible UST indication. As a further aid to the analysis, data profiles for each survey transect were <br /> prepared and inspected. The profiles are especially useful for assessing anomaly amplitudes and for <br /> identifying bad data caused by,say,a loose connection within the EM system or other type of equipment <br /> malfunction. <br /> 7.0 LIMITATIONS of GEOPHYSICAL LOCATING METHODS <br /> In general,a geophysical method's limitations for detecting a particular target are related to the target's <br /> size, burial depth, the amount of contrast in material properties between the target and surrounding <br /> material, and finally, the amount of interference from surrounding site features. For a target to be <br /> detected it must have sufficient size to reflect or otherwise disturb some the incoming energy used for <br /> detection. It also must have enough contrast with the surrounding material to reflect or otherwise disturb <br /> enough of the incoming energy so as to be detected. And, finally, it can't be buried so deeply that the <br /> reflected/disturbed energy is so dissipated that it is too weak to be detected when it returns to the surface. <br /> Weak energy returns during geophysical investigations are further exacerbated by ambient noise like that <br /> produced by natural and cultural features,such as utilities,fences,parked vehicles,vegetative cover,and <br /> debris. <br /> As stated above and shown on Figures 2 and 3, the Linden site contained buried utilities, and was <br /> bounded to the north by a building. These features produced electromagnetic interference that could <br /> have responses from buried objects,including a small UST. In addition soil conditions limited the GPR <br /> signal penetration to approximately 3 feet bgs;accordingly,objects buried deeper than 3 feet would not <br /> detected with GPR. <br /> p 5 ADVANCED GEOLOGICAL SERVICES <br />