My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS_2000-2003
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WAGNER
>
200
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009002
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS_2000-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/17/2020 3:11:07 PM
Creation date
6/17/2020 1:43:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
FileName_PostFix
2000-2003
RECORD_ID
PR0009002
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004040
FACILITY_NAME
SPX COOLING TECHNOLOGIES INC
STREET_NUMBER
200
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
WAGNER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
APN
14331007
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
200 N WAGNER AVE
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
397
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STAFF REPORT <br /> SPX CORPORATION <br /> MARLEY COOLING TOWER COMPANY <br /> GROUNDWATER EXTRACTION AND TREATMENT SYSTEM <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> A renewed NPDES Permit is being considered for adoption for the SPX Corporation,Marley <br /> Cooling Tower Company, Groundwater Extraction and Treatment System. <br /> BACKGROUND <br /> The Marley Cooling Tower Company(MCTC), a wholly owned subsidiary of SPX Corporation <br /> (hereafter Discharger) owns and operates a groundwater extraction and treatment system in the East <br /> Stockton Area of San Joaquin County. The Discharger previously operated a cooling tower <br /> fabrication plant at the site which included a wood preservation process using solutions containing <br /> copper, chromium and arsenic. Wood preserving was discontinued at this facility in January 1991, <br /> however past operational practices resulted in contamination of soils and groundwater underlying the <br /> site. Pursuant to a settlement agreement between the Department of Toxic Substances Control <br /> (DTSC)), the Discharger, and the Regional Board, the on-going groundwater remedial action at the <br /> site includes the extraction, treatment, and discharge of treated groundwater to the Stockton <br /> Diverting Canal, a tributary to the Calaveras River. The discharge was previously regulated by <br /> Waste Discharge Requirements Order No. 93-221, NPDES Permit No. CA0081787. Under this <br /> Order, the Discharger was permitted to discharge a maximum of 0.94 million gallons per day(mgd) <br /> of treated water to the Stockton Diverting Canal. <br /> ISSUES <br /> Designation of Beneficial Uses, New Total Dissolved Solids Effluent Limitation <br /> The beneficial uses of the SDC are not identified in the Basin Plan. Use of the tributan language in <br /> the Basin Plan and the application of State Board Resolution 88-63, Sources of Drinking Water <br /> Policy, resulted in the designation of municipal and domestic supply(MUN) and agricultural supply <br /> (AGR)beneficial uses to the SDC in this proposed Order. <br /> Order No. 93-221 includes an existing monthly average limitation for total dissolved solids (TDS) of <br /> 1000 mgfL(ppm). Because MUN is identified in this proposed Order as a beneficial use of the SDC, <br /> and because current information indicates there are periods of limited or no flow in the SDC, this <br /> proposed Order includes a new final monthly average effluent limitation for TDS of 500 mg/L <br /> protective of MUN (Secondary MCL). Currently, monthly average concentrations of TDS in the final <br /> effluent exceed the new effluent limitation established in this Order. The Regional Board, however, <br /> does not have sufficient information to determine if there is reasonable potential to violate the <br /> narrative water quality objective. Preliminary data provided by the Discharger indicate the SDC may <br /> provide some dilution and have some limited assimilative capacity for TDS, however, the receiving <br /> water characteristics have not been fully evaluated with respect to TDS. This proposed Order <br /> provides time for the Discharger, if they elect, to further study the characteristics and potential <br /> assimilative capacity of the SDC, consider the appropriateness of the MUN and/or AGR beneficial <br /> use designation of the SDC, and/or consider disposal and treatment alternatives. As this is a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.