Laserfiche WebLink
�J l <br /> 2801 West Lane, Stockton <br /> May 2005 r, <br /> , <br /> Page 2 &1 <br /> The screened intervals, completed depths, filter pack intervals of DMW-1 to DMW-7. <br /> included in Table 1 "Monitoring Well Construction Results" of the reports and previous <br /> quarterly sampling reports appeared to be incorrect. The numbers in Table I are contrary to <br /> the numbers reported in Table 1 of Closure Request Report dated July 2001 prepared by URS, <br /> quarterly sampling field records, and EHD official inspection reports at the time of well <br /> construction. Please review the original well logs and make any necessary corrections to <br /> Table 1 in all future reports. <br /> URS had previously submitted to EHD a wh survey in Section 3.2 and Appendix A of the <br /> above-mentioned Closure Request Report. URSreported in Section 3.2 that only one domestic <br /> well completed to 125 feet bsg within 2,000;feet south of the site. Appendix A, comprised <br /> of a table and a map,identified 27 wells in the area:' The radius of the circle on the map was <br /> not specified, but the radius of the circle appeared to far exceed 2,000 feet. Since a distance <br /> scale was not provided on the map,it is not'knownrwhich wells labeled on the map are <br /> actually within 2,000 feet of the site. Also, tg e specific domestic well discussed in Section <br /> 3.2 could not be identified on the map or table. According to the well-survey of the <br /> neighboring property, San Joaquin Catholic Cemetery,multiple private drinking and <br /> irrigation wells existed at the cemetery and S.6 Joseph's Hospital. None of these wells was <br /> -y <br /> identified or labeled on the well survey in Appendix A. Since the Harding Cemetery is <br /> located immediately adjacent to the site, it is; ikely many of these wells exist within 2,000 of <br /> the site. The well survey in Appendix A is therefore potentially underreported. Submit a <br /> comprehensive 2,000-foot well receptor survey to EHD or demonstrate the adequacy of the <br /> existing report by June 15,2005. The well survey should include a properly labeled map <br /> with distance scale and a 2,000-foot radius map, a Est of the identified wells with <br /> corresponding addresses and well construction log.'[Reliance solely on reviews of Water <br /> Well Drillers Reports at the California Division of Water Resources may be inadequate. <br /> Conduct a door-to-door well survey if required. A complete well survey with all wells <br /> existing within 2,000 feet of the site is required before a site can be considered for No <br /> Further Action status. <br /> Donna Heran, REHS, Director <br /> Environmental Health Department <br /> Jeffrey Wong, Senior REHS T Nuel C. Henderson,Jr., RG <br /> LOP/Site Mitigation Unit 1V LOP/Site Mitigation Unit IV <br /> c: URS Corporation—Anthony Mindh `g, RG s <br /> c: RWQCB, Central Valley Region—James Barton, RG <br /> t <br />