Laserfiche WebLink
No hydrocarbon impacts remain in soils between 0 and 10 feet bgs Therefore, it is <br /> unlikely that workers or the general public would come into direct contact with impacted soils <br /> or constituents of concern However, there would be no assurance that changes in future land <br /> use resulting in exposure to the impacted material would not occur <br /> 5 3 2 Limited Action Groundwater Monitonng---Option 2 <br /> This Limited Action option consists of an extensive groundwater monitoring program <br /> la <br /> designed to provide early warning of rising groundwater levels The groundwater table beneath <br /> the site was recently measured at 61 feet bgs, approximately 26 feet below the deepest identified <br /> diesel-impacted soil (Dames & Moore, 1994) If the groundwater table beneath the site rises <br /> to and maintains its historical maximum of 34 feet bgs (recorded in 1987), groundwater impacts <br /> could potentially occur <br /> Option 2 includes quarterly monitoring of groundwater elevations in on-site monitoring <br /> wells (including the new well to be constructed in 1994), annual groundwater sampling and <br /> analysis for the five wells, and preparation and submittal of annual monitoring reports to the <br /> PHS/EHD and RWQCB Groundwater samples would be analyzed for TPH/D, and BTEX The <br /> annual groundwater monitoring report would include hydrographs for each well, analytical <br /> laboratory data for groundwater samples collected during the previous year, and an evaluation <br /> of groundwater elevation and quality trends In addition, based on criteria developed by AFPC, <br /> PHS/EHD, and the RWQCB, the agencies would be notified within a specified period if <br /> significant, sustained increases in groundwater elevation or groundwater quality impacts occur <br /> beneath the site For the purpose of this study, it is assumed that the groundwater monitoring <br /> and reporting program would continue for a period of five years <br /> I <br /> Additionally, as with Option 1, the existing asphaltic concrete pavement would act as a <br /> cap to enhance surface runoff in the area of impacted soils The pavement would limit <br /> percolation through impacted soils, thereby reducing potential for migration of diesel constituents <br /> to the groundwater table Because Option 2 does not include pavement maintenance, the <br /> pavement may deteriorate somewhat over time, and could gradually become a less effective <br /> barrier to infiltration An additional mitigating factor is that naturally occurring soil microbes <br /> would continue to degrade the hydrocarbons <br /> SAC127 10 13 <br /> DAMES &MOORE <br />