Laserfiche WebLink
5.1.2 Reliability <br /> Technologies based on unproven methodology or too difficult to implement <br /> were eliminated from further consideration, Best Demonstrated Available <br /> Technologies (BDAT) were also the criteria for reliability. <br /> ' 5.1.3 Availability <br /> Availability of specific technologies and required attendant equipment, <br /> materials, procedures, and craft disciplines were considered during <br /> screening. Technologies using materials from foreign sources were screened <br /> ' out where similar domestic technologies perform adequately. In addition, <br /> those technologies requiring difficult procurement procedures (i.e., <br />' technologies that would result in sole-source remediation due to proprietary <br /> and patent rights) were not favored in the screening process. <br /> 5.1.4 Timeliness of Implementation <br /> Technologies requiring excessive time to implement were eliminated during <br /> the screening process. Given the size of the site and the extent of <br /> contamination, it was assumed that one year is a reasonable time frame for <br /> completion of a remedial alternative. <br /> 5.1.5 Cost <br /> Order of magnitude unit costs were used to compare technologies for <br /> screening purposes. Unit costs include capital, operating, and maintenance <br /> throughout the life of remediation. Waste characteristics which adversely <br /> affect specific technology cost were identified. <br /> I <br /> kh <br /> 5-2 <br /> GGA/0186b <br />