My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008138
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WEST
>
2801
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0504943
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008138
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2020 1:04:49 PM
Creation date
6/18/2020 12:10:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0008138
RECORD_ID
PR0504943
PE
2951
FACILITY_ID
FA0004032
FACILITY_NAME
AMERICAN MOULDING & MILLWORK (FRMR)
STREET_NUMBER
2801
STREET_NAME
WEST
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
11709001
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2801 WEST LN
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 3 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK REMOVAL <br />' On May 11, 1988 American Moulding and Millworks contracted Stockton Service Station to <br /> remove, decontaminate and dispose of the 10,000 gallon diesel UST west of the maintenance shop, and <br />' the 500 gallon waste oil UST to the east of the shop This work was carried out under the direction of <br /> the San Joaquin County Public Health Service Complete records of the work plans and tank removal <br />' operation were not available, however, all available documentation regarding the UST removals and <br /> subsequent soil sampling are attached in Appendix C <br />' At the time the tanks were removed, the product lines from the 10,000 gallon diesel tank <br /> remained in place Unfortunately,this was not discovered until a representative from San Joaquin County <br />' contacted American Moulding and Millwork in January 1991, after the remedial actions to excavate the <br /> impacted soil were completed The application to remove the product lines and close UST according to <br /> San Joaquin County regulations is described below in Section 2 6 <br /> 2 4 FEASIBILITY STUDY/REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN <br />' In April 1988, AFPC contracted Dames & Moore to review existing data and perform a <br /> supplemental site investigation in the maintenance shop area Dames & Moore received approval from <br /> San Joaquin Public Health Services-Environmental Health Department (PHS-EHD) for their proposed <br /> investigation The additional characterization included eighteen additional soil borings to a depth of <br />' approximately 45 feet bgs (Figure 2 1), the results of which are summarized in Appendix D At each <br /> boring location, soil samples were collected at five foot intervals between a depth of 10 feet to 40 feet <br />' bgs In July 1988, Dames & Moore completed the Feasibility Study/Remedial Action Plan (FS/RAP) <br /> containing a risk assessment, and the results of the additional soil sampling and analysis The FS/RAP <br /> was reviewed by PHS-EHD and was conditionally approved on November 3, 1988 The PHS-EHD <br />' comments were addressed by Dames & Moore on November 28, 1988 <br />' A total of 108 soil samples including 5 blind duplicates were analyzed for TPH/D (EPA <br /> Method 8015) Five soil samples were analyzed for polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (EPA <br /> Method 8010) Analytical results reported TPH/D concentrations at depths between 10 and 35 feet <br /> (Appendix D) Soils at the east and west end of the maintenance shop were found to be impacted, and <br /> the largest area impacted was generally in the south eastern corner of the maintenance shop Soil TPH <br />' concentrations ranged from 27 ppm to 28,000 ppm, with She highest concentrations occurring to the west <br /> of the maintenance shop at a depth of approximately 10 to 20 feet bgs (Appendix D) <br />' On June 13 and 15, 1988, Dames & Moore collected groundwater samples from the three JHKA <br /> monitoring wells The samples were analyzed for polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (EPA Method 6P) < <br /> L' <br /> SAC36046 <br /> 14, I <br /> L) <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.