Laserfiche WebLink
TABLE I <br /> SCREENING FOR REMEDIAL OPTION <br /> FORMER AMERICAN FOREST PRODUCTS COMPANY FACILITY <br /> STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA <br /> Criterion,Raw Score,and Weighted Score <br /> Effectiveness Reliability Implementabihty Safety Other Cost <br /> Implementation <br /> Impacts <br /> Weight = 8 Weight = 10 Technical Adm:mstrative Weight= 12 Weight=8 Weight-40 Total <br /> Weight = 12 Weight= 10 Score <br /> for <br /> Ra Weighted Ra Weighted Ra Weighted Ra Weighted Ra Weighted Ra Weighted Ra Weighted option <br /> Remedial Option w w IN w w w w <br /> Option I —No-Action 2 16 3 30 10 120 2 20 10 120 10 80 10 400 786 <br /> Option 2—Limited Action 6 48 6 60 10 120 5 50 10 120 10 80 9 360 838 <br /> (Groundwater Monitoring) <br /> Option 3—lamited Action 7 i56 7 70 10 120 6 60 10 120 9 72 B 320 818 <br /> (Groundwater Monitoring and <br /> Pavement Maintenance) <br /> Option 4--Bioventing 8 64 8 80 8 96 7 70 8 96 8 64 7 240 710 <br /> Option 5—In-Situ 8 64 9 90 6 72 8 80 7 84 8 64 6 280 734 <br /> Bioremediation <br /> Option 6a—Excavation to 9 72 to 100 4 48 I0 100 4 48 2 16 3 120 504 <br /> Background Concentration and <br /> Off-Site Treatment/Disposal <br /> Option 6b—Excavation to 8 64 9 90 5 60 9 90 5 60 3 24 5 200 588 <br /> 1,000 mg/kg and Off-Site <br /> Treatment/Disposal <br /> Option 7a—Excavation to 9 72 10 100 4 48 IO 100 4 48 2 16 2 80 464 <br /> Background Concentration and <br /> On-Site Thermal Treatment <br /> Option 7b—Excavation to 8 64 9 90 5 60 9 90 5 60 3 24 4 1 160 548 <br /> 1,000 mg/kg and On-Site <br /> Thermal Treatment <br /> MAXIMUM POINTS 10 80 10 100 10 120 10 100 10 120 10 80 10 400 1,000 <br /> POSSIBLE <br />