Laserfiche WebLink
LABO TORY FO O <br /> (1) The samples were received after the required holding time. <br /> (2) This analyte was detected in the method blank above the reporting limit. <br /> (3) This analyte was detected in the trip blank above the reporting limit. <br /> (4) The recovery of the matrix spike indicates the presence of matrix effects. The MBs <br /> recovery was acceptable. <br /> (5) The matrix spike recovery is not significant due to the high concentration of the <br /> analyte in the sample relative to the amount o of <br /> spikeadded. <br /> � a matrix interference. <br /> (6) The method of standard additions was pe <br /> (7) The variation in spike recoveries reflects the nonhomogeneity of the sample. <br /> (8) Accurate quantitation of the surrogate was not possible due to the extent of sample <br /> dilution. <br /> (9) The surrogate recovery was high due to the presence of interfering compounds in the <br /> sample. <br /> (10) The surrogate recovery was low due to matrix effects. The analysis was repeated <br /> with similar results. <br /> (11) The internal standard(s) are (s) was low due to matrix effects. The analysis was <br /> repeated with similar results. <br /> 01 (12) The detection limit was raised due to the insufficient amount of sample available for <br /> analysis. <br /> (13) The detection limit was raised due to the dilution required by high-level analytes in <br /> the sample. <br /> (14) The detection limit was raised due to the dilution required by high-level non-target <br /> analytes in the sample. <br /> (15) These compounds co-elute; therefore, a total value is reported for both. <br /> (16) The sample was tentatively identified and semi-quantitated based on the best <br /> chromatographic fit from the available standards. <br /> (17) The sample chromatogram resembled an "aged" hydrocarbon product. <br /> (18) Hydrocarbons were found in the range of gasoline and diesel but did not resemble a <br /> gasoline or diesel fingerprint. <br /> (19) The variation in duplicate results refrefls�th�on onhomogeneity of thogeneity of the e sample. The <br /> (20) The recovery of the matrix spike(s) <br /> MBS recovery was acceptable. <br /> (21) The sample was not analyzed on a second column. <br /> (22) The presence of di-n-butyl phthalate may be due to laboratory contamination. <br /> (23) This sample was analyzed outsto the high background from f the required holding tie rclient request. <br /> atnx interferences. <br /> (24) The detection limit was raised due <br /> 0' <br /> Revised 411195 <br />