Laserfiche WebLink
it <br /> FROM Ground 2erc Anal vs i e � PHONE NO. 209 838 9883 Feb. 15 2000 04:53PM P3 <br /> '• ,s <br /> k <br /> Mr.Harlin Knoll ! <br /> February 15, 2000 <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> had occurred. Sail boring locatior]s are shown on Figure 2_ Analytical results are summarized in <br /> Table 1, <br /> One 10,000-Sallon UST for storage or dieftl fuel ant I two 10,000 gallon USTs for the storage of <br /> gasoline and associated piping were removed under I terne t from PHSAEHD on January 21, 1999. <br /> Analytical results of sidewall soil samples and groundwater grab sample collected from beneath !I` <br /> the USTs indicated that elevated levels of petroleurn hydrocarbons were present in the soil and <br /> groundwater_ Sample locations are shown on Figure 2. Analytical results are summarized in <br /> Table 2. <br /> 2.2 Soil Boring Investigation <br /> In 7uly 1999, five direct push soil borings were ad oed along the perimeter of the former UST <br /> location to investigate the vertical and lateral extent of soil and groundwater contamination, and <br /> four hand augered soil borings were advanc*l to ' vestigate the lateral extent of shallow sail � <br /> contamination_ Soil boring locations are shown on Figure 2. Analytical resutts are sununarized in I <br /> Tables 3 and 4. <br /> I <br /> The results of this investigation were submitted to P 4S&HD in a report dated October 19, 1999. <br /> Based upon the localized contamination and its currm t accessibility, Ground Zero recommends the ,N <br /> implementation of remedial actions consisting of eKcz vation and limited groundwater extraction, as <br /> well as the installation of groundwater monitoring we 1s to further define the extent of gmundwater <br /> contamination. This "rkplan addendum address s proposed interim sail and groundwater <br /> remedial actions. The installation of groundwater monitoring wells will be scheduled upon <br /> completion of excavation and backfil ling activities anc have been addressed under separate cover. 0 <br /> 2.3 Hydrogeological Setting <br /> The site is located in Thornton, California, approximately 5,140 feet southwest of the <br /> Mokeluinne River, the nearest body of surface water. Surface elevation at the site is i <br /> approximately eight feet above sea level, <br /> i <br /> Based on historical information provided by San Joaquin County Flood Control and Water <br /> .Conservation District and groundwater information cm a nearby site, groundwater beneath the <br /> site is expected to flare in a southwesterly direction. Groundwater was fid en xntered at a � <br /> depth of to 7 feet in the borings drilled on the prop y. <br /> 3.0 NATURE AND EXTENT OF CONTAA01S A"1 ION <br /> 3.1 Soil Contamination <br /> The data from the soil baring investigation combined with data previously obtained have largely <br /> defined the extent of soil contamination_ Soil contamination appears to be limited to depths <br /> between approximately 6 and 13 feet bgs and is genet ally Mound in the area immediately adjacent to <br /> CvAProta NGP.aUNbZ1FkM AN 9 EP-W ansa 2Nf etot4mwp.dae <br /> i <br /> i <br />