Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />' 31 March 2004 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 03-1077 <br />' Page 3 of 7 <br /> I pushed to the specified depth, then the tip was withdrawn to expose a core barrel fitted with two six- <br /> inch long stainless steel sleeves, and the soil sampler was pushed down again to retrieve a 1-foot soil <br /> sample Soil samples were preserved by covering both ends of the bottom stainless steel sleeve with <br /> I Teflon sheets, capping, and sealing with tape Each sample sleeve was labeled with soil probe boring <br /> location, depth, time, date and sampler's initials and placed in a chilled container <br /> Soil-sample duplicates from the top sleeve were visually described on boring logs in accordance with <br /> the Unified Soil Classification System(USCS) Boring logs are included as Appendix B <br /> I2 2 2 Groundwater Sample Collection <br /> I Groundwater samples were collected from specified depth intervals (zones) based on the acquired <br /> CPT-lrthology data indicating favorable conditions for sampling A HydroPunch sampling tool was <br /> pushed into the specified zone, then withdrawn approximately four feet to expose an inlet screen, the <br /> interior of the sampling tool filled with water and a 1-inch outer diameter(O D ) stainless steel bailer <br /> was lowered and utilized to extract a groundwater sample <br /> IGroundwater samples were collected from CPT boring locations at the following intervals <br /> • CPT-2 was sampled between 65 and 70 feet bsg, between 82 and 86 feet bsg, between 94 and <br /> I98 feet bsg, and between 106 feet and 110 feet bsg, <br /> • CPT-3 was sampled between 65 and 69 feet bsg, between 80 and 84 feet,between 96 and 100 <br />' feet bsg, and between 110 and 114 feet bsg, and <br /> • CPT-4 was sampled between 65 and 70 feet bsg,between 80 and 84 feet, and between 107 and <br /> 111 feet bsg <br /> I <br /> The groundwater samples collected in the intervals between 65 and 70 feet bsg, 95 and 100 feet bsg and <br /> I below 105 feet bsg were from permeable sand zones as specified in the EHD work plan approval letter <br /> of 30 May 2003,the samples collected in the interval between 80 and 85 feet bsg were from an interval <br /> of possibly low-permeability clay, silty clay/clayey silt and silt which may have been a barrier to <br /> vertical migration of contaminants <br /> Each water sample was transferred into 40-m1 VOA vials containing 0 5 ml 18%hydrochloric acrd as <br /> I a sample preservative After collection, the samples were properly labeled and placed in a chilled <br /> container <br /> I <br /> 2 2 3 Equipment Decontanunation and Boring Abandonment <br /> IAdvanced CeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />