Laserfiche WebLink
HydroGeo Consultants <br /> 5.2 Pumping Well MW-5 ' <br /> P 9 <br /> MW-5 is a 2-mch diameter well that is installed to a depth of 90 feet below grade, with ' <br /> 0 020-inch slotted well screen from 20 feet below grade to the wells total depth of 90 feet <br /> below grade The sand pack extends approximately three feet above the top of screen, an t <br /> estimated depth of 17 feet below grade, to the bottom of the borehole at 90 feet below <br /> grade The bottom of the well was measured in the field at a depth of 82 18 feet below <br /> grade and the well was most likely filled with silt from 82 18 feet below grade to the well <br /> total depth Although there is a noticeably more permeable zone of sand and silty sand at <br /> a depth of 65 to 70 below grade, this zone did not contain water when this well was <br /> installed Groundwater appears to be present under unconfined water-table conditions , <br /> Static groundwater was measured prior to conducting the pumping test in MW-5 at a <br /> depth of 42 24 feet below grade, indicating an estimated aquifer thickness of 40 feet <br /> The pumping test was started at 11 30 on March 16, 2002 and was maintained at a ' <br /> constant pumping rate of approximately 1 5 to 1 6 gallons per minute (gpm) for 1,429 <br /> minutes, terminating at 11 19 on March 17, 2002 A total of 2,040 gallons of water was ' <br /> removed during the pumping test and stored onsite in 34 DOT approved drums awaiting <br /> proper disposal The recovery was monitored and recorded however the discharge hose <br /> drained back down the well since the pump apparently did not contain a check valve, thus , <br /> making the recovery data at the beginning of the test unusable The drawdown was <br /> measured and recorded at regular intervals throughout the test from the pumping well <br /> MW-5 A petroleum sheen was noted on the pump discharge hose at the completion of <br /> the test, however no measurable free product was present in the well or observed in the <br /> pump discharge during the test <br /> Figure 5 and 6 illustrates the drawdown and recovery graphs for the pumping well MW- , <br /> 5 The drawdown and recovery data for this well are summarized in Tables 4 and 5, <br /> respectively, and copies of field data are included in Appendix A , <br /> Analysis of drawdown and recovery data for MW-5 is presented in the following Table <br /> 1 An estimated saturated thickness of 40 feet was assumed from the well depth, static ' <br /> groundwater level the day of the pumping test, and the lithologic logs for the Site <br /> According to Todd (1980), hydraulic conductivities in this range are representative of <br /> soils consisting of fine grained sand to silt, which is representative of the sediment , <br /> described in the boring log for MW-5 It should be noted that if thicker saturated <br /> thicknesses were assumed, the calculated hydraulic conductivity would decrease <br /> accordingly , <br /> 1 <br /> Page 8 TOC H171 Aquifer Test and RAP Rpt ' <br />