My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2019
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CLARK
>
3927
>
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
>
PR0514138
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/7/2021 10:49:37 AM
Creation date
6/23/2020 11:02:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2019
RECORD_ID
PR0514138
PE
2250
FACILITY_ID
FA0010034
FACILITY_NAME
PNP Stockton #80
STREET_NUMBER
3927
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
CLARK
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
APN
17917109
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
3927 E CLARK DR
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\dsedra
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
696
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Also, there is a variance provision for existing tanks under § 66265.193, Containment and Detection of <br /> Releases, that was brought up by a colleague, but I have determined that that only applies to secondary <br /> containment requirements and you mentioned that this tank does have secondary containment, correct? <br /> § 6626o.io. Definitions: <br /> "New tank system" or "new tank component" means a tank system or component that will be used for <br /> the transfer, storage or treatment of hazardous waste and for which installation (as defined under <br /> "Existing tank system" in this section) has commenced after the dates indicated below; except, <br /> however, for purposes of sections 66264.193(g) and 66265.193(g), a new tank system is one for <br /> which construction commences after the dates indicated below: (See also "Existing tank system.") <br /> (a) July 14, 1986, for tanks containing RCRA hazardous wastes, unless: <br /> (1) the owner or operator is a conditionally exempt small quantity generator as defined in 40 CFR <br /> section 261.5, or a 100 to 1,000 kg per month generator as defined in 40 CFR section 265.201, or <br /> (2) the owner or operator is not subject to regulation in 40 CFR part 264 or part 265 pursuant to an <br /> exemption in 40 CFR section 264.1 or section 265.1; <br /> (b) July 1, 1991 for: <br /> (1) tanks containing only non-RCRA hazardous wastes, and <br /> (2) tanks containing RCRA hazardous wastes, if: <br /> (A) the owner or operator is a conditionally exempt small quantity generator or a 100 to 1,000 kg per <br /> month generator, or <br /> (B) the owner or operator is not subject to regulation in 40 CFR part 264 or part 265 pursuant to an <br /> exemption in 40 CFR section 264.1 or section 265.1, but the owner or operator is subject to the <br /> standards of article 10 of chapter 14 or article 10 of chapter 15 of this division. <br /> All new tanks shall be tested for tightness prior to being placed in use using tank system integrity or leak tests. <br /> According to this, it does not necessarily have to have a vacuum test performed for tank assessment. It does <br /> not specify the types of integrity testing in§ 66264.192 for new tanks, but in § 66264.191 for existing tanks it <br /> states that integrity tests other than pressure tests may be used {results of a leak test, internal inspection, or <br /> other tank system integrity examination performed (i.e., ultrasonic, internal examination, volumetric tank test, <br /> pipeline pressure test} It does say that these requirements must be in compliance with all local requirements <br /> though. One option would be to contact the CUPA and ask if system integrity tests such as the above would be <br /> sufficient. <br /> Everything I keep reading leads me back to the system integrity "or" leak test. <br /> If the CUPA is still insisting on a vacuum test, have you guys contacted the manufacturer to see if there is any way to <br /> obtain a sealed cover for the 16" opening? <br /> If any more info funnels in from other units that I have inquired to, I will let you know. <br /> Thank you, <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.