Laserfiche WebLink
270 THOMAS H. POGSON AND SUSAN M. LINDSTEDT <br /> TABLE L Numbers of large sandhill cranes counted in California's Central Valley,Winter 1983-1984. Missing <br /> values indicate no data were collected. <br /> Regions October November December January <br /> L.ocauons Date No.cranes Date No.canes Date No.cranes Date No.nines <br /> Chico <br /> A. Fcnn's 20 216 21-22 X 20 X 23-24 X <br /> Llano Seco Rancho 20 X 22 257 20 455 23 560 <br /> M&T Ranch 20 X 21 424 20 262 23 394 <br /> Nelson — — 20 69 24 169 <br /> Sub-totals 216 681 786 1,123 <br /> Afton <br /> Schorr Ranch 10-20 0 17-20 0 20 688 24 0 <br /> Terhel Farms 10-20 0 17-20 0 20 0 24 233 <br /> Sub-totals 0 0 688 233 <br /> Butte Sink <br /> Bean Patch, 19 1,500 19-20 X 19-20 0 26 0 <br /> Brady Ranch 18 1,168 20 2,246 20 469 26 231• <br /> Butte Basin Farm 18 509 19 934 19 60 26 0 <br /> Gray Lodge W.M.A., 17 702 19-20 X 20 630° 26 0 <br /> Sub-totals 3,879 3,180 1,159 231 <br /> Thornton <br /> Canal Ranch 25 296 27 35 12 467 28 X <br /> Cortopassi Farms 22-28 0 27-30 0 11 393 28 X <br /> 011 <br /> E. Merlo & Sons 26 188 30 279 12 635 28 X <br /> El Dorado 24 475 30 909 12 709 28 2,195 <br /> Grand Island 26-30 0 16 675 28 0 <br /> Staten Island 24 813 29 845 9 595 28 1,634 <br /> Sub-totals 1,772 2,068 3,474 3,829 <br /> Cosumnes 26 65 3 197 7 238 29 1,390 t <br /> Modesto <br /> Faith & Mape's R. 5 80 29, 128 28 142 <br /> Bogetti Harms — — — — 28 84 — — <br /> Sub-totals 80 128 226 — <br /> Merced NWR — — — — 14 32 <br /> Pixley NWR — — — — 3° 14 — — <br /> Totals 6,012 6,057 6,617 6,810 <br /> X -targe sandhill nines which probably represent the same individuals counted at a different site on the same day. <br /> •Cranes counted on the Brady Ranch and surrounding lands <br /> 'Cranes counted in the vicinity of Gray Lodge W.M.A. <br /> 29 October 1993. <br /> 'January. <br /> Managed for wintering waterfowl by state and federal agencies. <br /> 1 <br /> RESULTS <br /> DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE 1)• More than half of the population used the <br /> Butte Sink during October and November, but <br /> Central Valley Population cranes, including only 18 and 3%of the population used this region <br /> Greater and Canadian Sandhill Cranes, began in December and January,respectively. Declines <br /> arriving on their wintering areas the third week in the use of the Butte Sink corresponded with <br /> of September, and by late October most were an increase at Chico, Thornton, and in the Co- <br /> present in California's Central Valley. The pop- sumnes region.Thornton replaced the Butte Sink <br /> ulation wintered at eight regions during the win- as the most important winter area in December, Ft"` <br /> tern of 1983-1984 and 1984-1985 (Fig. 1), and supporting 53% of the population. In January, - <br /> the distribution of the population varied season- Thornton and the adjacent Cosumnes River <br /> ally among the regions of the winter range(Table floodplain supported 76% of the population. <br /> VI-L3D <br />