Laserfiche WebLink
4.3 GEOLOGY AND SOILS <br /> In 1991, Lowry and Associates drilled 17 test borings to determine soil and water conditions and to <br /> provide geotechnical design recommendations for development of the project. Nine of the borings,dug <br /> generally to a depth of 15 feet, were located in the area proposed for housing. The borings confirmed <br /> the presence of hardpan soils. Depth to cementation(hardpan)was found to vary from 18 to 36 inches. <br /> The hardpan layer consisted of light brown fine sandy silts (Unified Soil Classification ML) and cemented <br /> brown silty fine to medium sands (SM), extending to depths of 15 to 25 feet. No groundwater was <br /> observed when the borings were completed (August, 1991). <br /> Two deep borings made by Lowry were adjacent to the Mokelumne River at the proposed bridge <br /> crossing. The soils in the upper 35 feet consisted of mainly silty to fine sand (ML) to fine and medium <br /> sand (SM). Groundwater was observed at depths of 22 and 25 feet. <br /> Three borings drilled in the lake beds consisted mainly of brown clayey silts (ML) and organic silts <br /> (OH). Groundwater was observed in one boring (BH) at a depth of 14 feet. <br /> In connection with the present EIR, Questa Engineering conducted a reconnaissance soils investigation <br /> with emphasis on soil suitability for on-site sewage disposal (Figure 4.3-2). Soils were evaluated from <br /> a series of six hand-augered borings generally about four to five feet deep. Observed soil conditions <br /> agreed with those mapped by the SCS,with one notable exception. The soils observed west of Buckeye <br /> Drive appear to have very poor drainage and shallow groundwater conditions(i.e.,an estimated three feet <br /> or less to the water table), rather than well to excessively drained as indicated by the SCS mapping. <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES <br /> Significance Criteria <br /> All identified impacts are considered significant adverse impacts. The corresponding mitigation measure, <br /> unless otherwise noted,would be sufficient to reduce impacts to a less-than-significant level. Although <br /> not required by CEQA, some less-than-significant impacts have been discussed because they are issues <br /> of local concern. While no mitigations are required by CEQA for less-than-significant impacts, in some <br /> cases mitigation measures are proposed that would reduce the level of impact. <br /> The CEQA guidelines define a significant impact on the geologic or soil environment as "... a <br /> substantial, or potentially substantial, adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area <br /> affected by the project." The guidelines also stipulate that the EIR analyze significant environmental <br /> effects the project might cause by bringing development or people into the area affected by geologic or <br /> soil hazards. <br /> 4.3-3 <br />