SU0013451 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

6.0 ALTERNATIVES CEQA Guidelines (15126(d))require that a range of reasonable alternatives to the project be described which could feasibly attain the basic objectives of the project. Four alternatives to the proposed project are evaluated against the proposed project. The alternatives addressed in this chapter include: no project, development without golf course, elimination of the haul route and a mitigated alternative. Because the proposed project is closely interlinked with the preservation and enhancement of the existing natural environment,an no analysis of an alternative site is net included. 6.1 NO PROJECT The no project alternative assumes no development of the property. Impacts associated with the proposed project would be negated under this alternative. However, left undeveloped it is unlikely the woodland and lakes would be retained as a nature preserve unless a public agency or conservation organization assumes ownership of the property. The potential exists for the land to be leveled for agricultural production,such as vineyards. Land Use/Planning Policy The project site would continue in agricultural production and Williamson Act contracts would not be canceled. There would be no added incentive for adjacent property owners to file for Non-Renewal of Williamson Act contracts. If a more intensive agricultural use of the site is undertaken, significant impacts to biological and cultural resources would occur. Traffic/Circulation No changes in existing transportation conditions would occur. The site would remain as is, thus no change in vehicle trips from existing conditions. A haul route would not be necessary. Geology This alternative would not generate any of the wastewater disposal or soil erosion impacts identified for the proposed project. Noise Noise levels in and around the site would stay at the current level, as the site would remain vacant. 6-1