My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0013451
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LAKE FOREST
>
2248
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
WC-90-1
>
SU0013451
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2021 4:00:53 PM
Creation date
6/23/2020 11:17:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0013451
PE
2600
FACILITY_NAME
WC-90-1
STREET_NUMBER
2248
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
LAKE FOREST
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ACAMPO
APN
00306001
ENTERED_DATE
6/17/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
2248 W LAKE FOREST RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\dsedra
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1834
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Nature Conservanc <br /> y <br /> California Field Office <br /> 785 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94103 <br /> (415) 777-0487— FAX (415) 777-0244 <br /> February 7 , 1991 = EtV <br /> FEB <br /> Ms . Kerry Sullivan IS,A(v <br /> San Joaquin County PLANNING, DiViSION <br /> Community Development Dept . <br /> 1810 E. Hazelton Avenue <br /> Stockton, CA 95205 <br /> RE: Scoping Session for EIR No . ER-91-2 for Buckeye Ranch <br /> project in San Joaquin County <br /> Dear Ms . Sullivan, <br /> The Conservancy has received from you the following documents : <br /> ( 1 ) Buckeye Ranch Planned District Description <br /> (2 ) Notice of Completion/ Appendix F <br /> ( 3 ) Initial Study/Discussion of Environmental Impact <br /> ( 4 ) Notice of EIR Preparation <br /> At various places in these documents , The Nature Conservancy is <br /> mentioned in connection with the possibility of a Conservation <br /> Easement being placed on the subject property. References are <br /> made to "discussions in process" with the Conservancy and similar <br /> phrases indicating an ongoing development of an easement <br /> document . A draft easement in the name of The Nature Conservancy <br /> is included in the Planned Project Description. <br /> It is the express policy of The Nature Conservancy not to become <br /> involved in the regulatory approval process , or to give even an <br /> appearance that we support any given development proposal . We <br /> offer no opinion as to whether the County should approve this <br /> project . <br /> The- extent of the Conservancy' s involvement in this project has <br /> been to offer some very preliminary management ideas to the <br /> landowners at their request , and to recommend to them a highly- <br /> regarded independent forester (Pam Muick) who has carried out an <br /> ecological study of the property. <br /> With respect to the various references to The Nature Conservancy <br /> in the documents we have received from you, we believed we had <br /> conveyed to the applicant our desire not to have the <br /> Conservancy' s name mentioned in connection with a Conservation <br /> Easement . Through a misunderstanding with the applicant , this <br /> Western Regional Office, 785 Market Street, San Francisco, CA 94103 <br /> National Office, 1815 North Lynn Street,Arlington, Virginia 22209 <br /> Aecvcied Paper <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.