Laserfiche WebLink
LEVEL OF SERVICE CONCEPT <br /> Signalized Intersection <br /> Level of Service (LOS) is the primary indicator for traffic operation performance at intersections. <br /> The volume-capacity ratio (v/c) is determined by the volume of conflicting traffic movements per <br /> hour and the capacity designed to accommodate them. This ratio, in turn, is rated from LOS "A" <br /> to "F." The range describes increasing traffic demand, delays, and deterioration of services. <br /> LOS "A" represents free-flow conditions with little or no delay (zero to five seconds) at <br /> intersections. On the contrary, LOS "E" characterizes extremely unstable flow conditions with <br /> volumes at or near the designed capacity. Vehicles are likely to experience major delays (40 to <br /> 60 seconds) crossing an intersection. Minor incidents may lead to forced flow conditions (LOS "F") <br /> with operating volume substantially below capacity. This results in long queues backing up from <br /> all approaches to intersections. <br /> LOS ratings from signalized and unsignalized intersections are determined based on different <br /> criteria and hence are not directly comparable. <br /> Two-Way Stop-Sign Controlled Intersection <br /> Level of service to individual turning movements on all approaches are determined by a number <br /> of factors. These include merging and opposing volumes, arrival frequency on the minor approach. <br /> approach speeds, critical gap, sign control, design capacity and intersection geometry. <br /> The resulting LOS reflects delays experienced by that minor street traffic. Thus, while the overall <br /> operating condition of the intersection is stable (LOS "C"), certain turning movements to/from the <br /> side street could experience delays equivalent to LOS "E" or "F." <br /> Four-Way Stop-Sign Controlled Intersection <br /> Vehicle delay is not related to critical gap since stopping is required on all approaches. Instead. <br /> interaction of vehicles is complex and depends on the arrival distribution on different approaches. <br /> departure headways, design capacity and intersection geometry. <br /> The resulting LOS reflects similar overall delays described for signalized locations. However, if <br /> volumes are substantially"unbalanced" between the intersection legs, vehicles on the highest volume <br /> approach would experience disproportionate delays. <br />