Laserfiche WebLink
r+ -• »� r• .r rMLA i rii 1 is t-msoc iates i u San Joaquin Co P.09 <br /> BUCKEYE RANCH ( 4-1-92 ) 9 <br /> sites were planted in vineyards and asparagus it possible <br /> their integrity has been compromised severely but probably not <br /> anymore than that of the lumped "TRACY LAKE SITE" . <br /> On what basis is Tracy Lake defined as a pluvial lake that would <br /> have provided an abundant resource base for Paleolndians. The <br /> lake size is so small and ephemeral it bears no relationship to <br /> the large well defined pluvial lakes found elsewhere in <br /> California. In addition the Sacramento/San Joaquin delta did not <br /> begin to form until within the last 4500 years thus the marsh <br /> lands currently to the west were dry land with associated river <br /> channels . It is likely that earlier peoples living or passing <br /> through the area would have travelled further west and that , as <br /> Moratto ( 1934 ) has stated. the older sites may be under the <br /> alluvial soils and delta pests . At the University of California. <br /> Davis campus buried soils radio carabon dated at just over 4. 000 <br /> vears ago . in the Highway 113 road cut , are below eight to ten <br /> feet of alluvium. It is clear therefore that the resource base <br /> and conditions at and around what are now the Tracy Lakes was <br /> quite different several thousand years ago. Based on Current <br /> information it appears that very little was going on in the Tracy <br /> Lakes locality until quite recently prehistorically. The <br /> location of a potentially older prehistoric site, based on soil <br /> chemistry. mightrepresent an earlier occupation sequence in the <br /> locality but thi,s remains to be defined. <br /> 3 ) . The suggestion in the Cultural Resources section of the <br /> E. I .R. that three of the cultural resources identified by the <br /> consulting archaeologists were relatively undisturbed is clearly <br /> in need of reevaluation. The OTRACY LAKE" site defined by the <br /> consulting • archaeologists as a single site has been virtually <br /> destroyed in some aspects . Portions of midden deposits have been <br /> .used for borrow and for levee construction . One midden remnant <br /> on the south shore of South Tracy Lake probably exists only <br /> because it has a telephone pole in it . The rest of the deposit <br /> had been bulldozed away. Extensive vandalism apparently occurred <br /> 1 probably at other locations as well . Within <br /> the tree line at Brovelli Woods there is extensive evidence of <br /> land disturbance in the past and in some places there are large <br /> deep elongated pits and trenches which may represent periods in <br /> the past when the Mokelumne River overflowed in the woods and <br /> washed out areas of unconsolidated alluvial deposits. <br /> 4) . In chapter 3 the suggested mitigation measures are most <br /> often inappropriate since the consulting archaeologists have not <br /> defined were the cultural resources are in relationship to the <br /> proposed developments within the project . To make broad <br /> generalizing site boundaries and then suggest that everything <br /> within those areas should be eliminated is su;gestin a precedent <br /> that would preclude any type of development within t9e vicinity <br /> of any riparian habitat in San Joaquin County or elsewhere. If <br /> the specific boundaries of each midden deposit is defined and <br /> isolated features and artifacts taken into consideration it is <br /> possible that the archaeological resources can be protected <br /> without eliminating completely any develowent on the shores of <br /> Tracy Lake . On Page 3-16 it is implied t9at the only way to <br /> ovoid significant impact to the archaeological sites is to <br /> basically leave the area undisturbed Vith no development on or in <br /> the vicinity of the four locations identified by the consultins� <br /> archaeologists. The sites have already been heavily impacted by <br />