Laserfiche WebLink
Mokelumne River Alliance <br /> April 8, 1992 <br /> APR 81992 <br /> -' WMMUIVI I Y 0i:'/�t.vi'�'�i`i <br /> PUNNING DIVISION <br /> San Joaquin County Community Development Department <br /> Attention: Kerry Sullivan <br /> 1810 East Hazelton Avenue <br /> Stockton, CA 95205-6232 <br /> Re: Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report, No. ER-91-2. SCH No. 91012103, <br /> for the "Buckeye Ranch Subdivision" Proposed by The Catwil Corporation. <br /> Dear Community Development Department, Kerry Sullivan, and Mills Associates: <br /> i <br /> The mission of the Mokelumne River Alliance (MRA) is "the long-term preservation and <br /> restoration of the Mokelumne River and its bordering habitat for the present and future benefit of <br /> wildlife, fisheries, and citizens of the area." We feel the proposed Buckeye Ranch Subdivision and its <br /> potential identified and unidentified adverse impacts on biotic and cultural resources are contrary to <br /> our mission and wise planning in this County. We feel that the potential adverse impacts on this one- <br /> of-a-kind biotic and cultural resource wonderland are not and can not be adequately mitigated, <br /> therefore, we submit the following comments: <br /> We compliment the developers and the Draft EIR authors for what appears to be a <br /> comprehensive and worthy risk assessment of the Buckeye Ranch Subdivision proposal. In reading <br /> through the Draft EIR, though, we can not help, but wonder, if the developer made a mistake in <br /> purchasing "Brovelli Woods" for this project. The old adage, "buyer be ware," seems to be an C40 <br /> appropriate consideration in hindsight. The identified potential adverse impacts on biotic and cultural <br /> resources will be admittedly significant and we suggest unmitigable. We ask, "How do you mitigate <br /> r for the unmitigable?" We note that the suggested mitigation to lesson the adverse impacts to less <br /> 1 than a significant level, if followed, will radically alter the proposed project to the point, where we feel, <br /> that the project would be unfeasible for the proponents. We suggest that infeasibility is an accurate <br /> summation of any consideration of this project. Considering the current and historic integrity of biotic <br /> and cultural resources on the project site, we recommend no project, with the caveat that a public <br /> agency, conservation organization, or land trust work with the developers towards a purchase or the <br /> granting of a conservation easement to protect these valuable resources. <br /> The biotic resources of the Brovelli Woods/Tracy Lakes area are widely known throughout the 1 <br /> state. What remains of the woods are the last remaining plant community examples of a closed- C41 <br /> canopy, interior, live oak, riparian forest that exists in San Joaquin County and the Valley. We hope <br /> ,he developer, the County, and the Draft EIR authors adequately understand and consider the <br /> P. O. Box 1971,Lodi IH-71 '.41 209-368-9396 <br />