Laserfiche WebLink
2. That the cancellation is in the public interest. <br /> Each of these findings include sub-findings that also must be made by the Board. The applicants have <br /> submitted supporting language for both sets of findings. They believe that both sets of findings have <br /> substantial merit and that the Board should have the opportunity to decide which set they prefer to use <br /> if they decide to take an action to approve the cancellations. Both sets of findings are attached to this <br /> Board Letter as Attachments E(1) and E(2). Further, each set of findings has been specifically tailored <br /> to the particulars of the Buckeye Ranch site. Attachment E(2) contains the supporting language for the <br /> findings and sub-findings regarding consistency with the purposes of the Williamson Act. <br /> Letters in Opposition: Attachment F includes letters received from Senator Patrick Johnston, the <br /> Department of Fish and Game, the Department of Conservation and several individuals in opposition to <br /> the Williamson Act Contract Cancellation. The Department of Conservation notes that contract <br /> cancellation is reserved for unusual 'emergency' situations, and that the Supreme Court has stated that <br /> cancellation is not appropriate where the objectives served by cancellation could be served by <br /> nonrenewal. <br /> The Department of Fish and Game states that several biological issues they raised at the Draft EIR stage <br /> have not been adequately addressed in the Final EIR stage have not been adequately addressed in the <br /> Final EIR, thus they recommend that the FEIR not be certified, and that the contract not be cancelled until <br /> the issues they identified be resolved. These issues include: inadequate surveys for the Valley Elderberry <br /> Longhorn Beetle (federally threatened) inadequate discussion and lack of mitigation for the Greater <br /> Sandhill Crane (state threatened), lack of information regarding the amount of seasonal wetland habitat <br /> which will be lost and no mitigation for this loss, and does not resolve the issue of how to mitigate for the <br /> intrusion into the mature riparian forest, the resultant loss of 13 acres of habitat and subsequent <br /> degradation of habitat quality. <br /> Cancellation Value and Cancellation Fees: The County Assessor is responsible for computing a <br /> cancellation fee for the subject property based on 121/2 percent of the current market value. Prior to giving <br /> tentative approval to the cancellation of any contract, the Board must certify to the County Auditor the <br /> amount of the cancellation fee that the landowner must pay upon cancellation. The computed fee <br /> calculation is provided as follows: <br /> Portion of APNs 003-060-01, 003-060-02, 003-100-01 <br /> Total Acres = 337 <br /> Value = $674,000.00 <br /> Penalty Factor = x 12.5% <br /> Total Penalty Amount = $ 84,250.00 <br /> Conditions and Contingencies: Before the Board can execute a final Certificate of Cancellation, the <br /> landowner must satisfy the following conditions and contingencies: <br /> 1. Payment in full of the amount of the cancellation fee. Unless the fee is paid within the time period <br /> specified by the County Assessor (which is: One year from the date of the recordation of the <br /> tentative cancellation), said fee shall be recomputed as of the date of the notice from the <br /> landowner that all other conditions and contingencies have been satisfied. <br /> 2. Obtain approval of a Planned District Phase II application. <br /> 3. Secure appropriate permits from the county for the proposed uses. <br /> BOS LETTER PAGE 3 <br />