Laserfiche WebLink
IV. RESPONSES TO PUBLIC HEARING ON DRAFT EIR -- MARCH 11, 1992 <br /> DI: This is a statement of opinion and no further response is necessary. <br /> D2: Refer to response C256. <br /> D3: Refer to response C257. <br /> D4: Refer to response C258. <br /> D5: Refer to responses C259 and 1321. <br /> D6: Refer to responses C260 and C261. <br /> D7: The EIR authors concur with the commenter regarding the sandhill crane's elusive behavior. The <br /> original biological study reported the sighting of one crane on the project site. When the survey <br /> work resumed at the beginning of March, the cranes had already left the project site, thus a <br /> thorough survey of the crane did not occur. Commenter should also refer to responses 137 in <br /> Chapter VI. <br /> D8: Comments noted. <br /> D9: Refer to revised biological study in Volume II, Section 4.7. <br /> D10: This is acknowledged in Volume II, Section 4.1. <br /> D11: Refer to Volume II, Section 5.3. <br /> D12: This comment is unclear. Mitigation measures would be incorporated as conditions of project <br /> approval. <br /> D13: This is a statement of opinion and no further response is necessary. <br /> D14: Groundwater overdraft problems are discussed in Section 4.6 of the Draft EIR. <br /> D15: Comments noted. <br /> D 16: Comments noted. <br /> D17: Refer to revised biological study in Volume II, Section 4.7. <br /> D18: Refer to response C45. <br /> D 19: Refer to response C52. <br /> D20: Comments noted. <br /> IV-7 <br />