SU0013451 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

young water birds is not and can not be mitigated. We ask in the Final EIR that the inconsistency between a project consideration and the Migratory Bird Conservation Act be resolved or clarified. Mokelumne River: It appears that there is an inadequate discussion of impacts on the Mokelumne River caused by the proposed project. Our concern is specifically over pumping from the river. The lower Mokelumne River is identified by the EPA as a "limited water quality segment." Any further diversions or adverse affects on water quality will impair an already beleaguered river ecosystem. The proposed bridge construction over the Mokelumne and access road to the west should not be approved. There is no discussion in the DEIR or the D133 RDEIR of adverse impacts to the river and its bordering habitat from this bridge construction. Many unidentified and unmitigated problems are associated with bridge construction, such as: siltation, sedimentation, and fish entrapment. We can not help, but wonder, if it is appropriate to build a bridge across the Mokelumne to accommodate the traffic of twenty-six houses and a golf course. We know of no other bridge crossing in the County for private use, other than the limited nature of Claude C. Woods haul road bridge, north of Clements. We feel this is not a desirable precedent and request that federal agencies input on this consideration before the project consideration proceeds. If this bridge and access road are built, we caution the County D134 and RDEIR authors that there is a state obligation, via the Subdivision Map Act, to provide public access. We find no discussion of this requirement in the documents. Vernal Pools: We have questions as to the adequacy of the study that was conducted D135 on the project site vernal pools. We understand that there is grazing near the vernal pool sites, but we question whether it is an accurate determination based on cursory studies to dismiss the presence of threatened or endangered species in these pools. Riparian Woodland: This classic remnant of a mature valley riparian woodland still retains some biological integrity. This very rare plant community example exists in only a few D136 places in the Central Valley. Any further encroachment into these woods should be stopped. The clearing of underbrush next to the artificially created fairways should be avoided. Valley Grassland: In the discussion of grasslands it refers to the historic valley bunch grass, but does not allude to any identified on the site. Was any bunch grass identified on the D137 project site. If it was identified, protection measures need to be factored in to protect this very rare beneficial plant. Birds: The significant interrelationship of birds and the Brovelli Woods/Tracy Lakes area is alluded to many times in the DEIR and the RDEIR biological sections. It is stated that one-third of the identified birds on the project site are water dependent. Any disturbance at Brovelli Woods, primarily to Tracy Lakes will be catastrophic to these dependent birds. We note that it is mentioned that Brovelli Woods is known as the site of one of the D138 largest nesting colonies of Turkey Vultures in North America. Why wasn't the significance of project impacts on this nesting colony discussed further? VI-112