My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008257 CASE 1
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WEBER
>
936
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0507178
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008257 CASE 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/23/2020 2:41:02 PM
Creation date
6/23/2020 1:28:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0008257 CASE 1
RECORD_ID
PR0507178
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0007729
FACILITY_NAME
STOCKTON MULTMODAL
STREET_NUMBER
936
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
WEBER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
936 E WEBER AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> ' 14 GROUND WATER HYDROLOGY <br /> During drilling activities, ERM typically encountered ground water in <br /> ' borings at depths between 30 and 40 feet bgs The ground water <br /> potentiometric surface at the property ranges from approximately <br /> 31 to 35 feet bgs <br /> ERM evaluatedound water flow a <br /> gn' t the former UST location using the <br /> ' three on-site monitoring wells Table 1 presents the ground water <br /> elevations recorded during quarterly sampling events Ground water flow <br /> direction in the aquifer beneath the site fluctuates, although the majority of <br /> ' monitoring events indicate a northwestern trend of flow The most recent <br /> ground water elevation contour map, along with a rose diagram displaying <br /> historical ground water flow direction, is shown on Figure 5 An <br />' anomalous ground water flow direction to the east was observed during <br /> ground water monitoring conducted on 22 June 2000 After reviewing the <br /> data, it should be noted that the difference m ground water elevation <br /> between the three wells was 0 06 feet, a very flat gradient for the site based <br /> on historical data Also of note, during the monitoring on 22 June 2000, it <br />' was noted that MW-1 was under pressure when the monitoring well cap <br /> was removed to measure the ground water level The water level was <br /> allowed to equilibrate for over an hour prior to measuring, however, it is <br />�. possible that the ground water level had not fully equilibrated prior to <br /> measurement If the ground water level had not equilibrated fully, the <br /> ground water level may have risen higher, which may have changed the <br />' ground water flow to a more northerly gradient <br /> Ground water wells are a common source of potable water in the Great <br /> Valley geomorphic province, however, no water supply wells exist within <br /> a 2,000-foot radius of the site A copy of the Environmental Data Resources <br />' (EDR) Radius Map has been included as Figure 6 The wells shown on <br /> Figure 6 within a 2,000-foot radius of the site have all been abandoned <br /> This information satisfies Item #1 of the PHS/EHD checklist <br /> I <br /> ERM 3 <br /> 43435a/uPaa/o2/i 3/03 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.