Laserfiche WebLink
' Mr. M. Scott Mansholt—CEMC <br /> First Quarter 2007 Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling Report April 24,2007 <br /> ' Vernalis Pump Station Page 4 of 5 <br /> • TPHd(C,o—C25),using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)Method 8015B and TPHd <br /> with silica-gel preparation for samples with detectable concentrations of TPHd using EPA <br /> Method 801513; and <br /> • PAHs using EPA Method 8270C selective ion monitoring(SIM). <br /> ' The groundwater analytical results are summarized and compared with the RWQCB Region 2 <br /> Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs)and the numerical State WQOs in Tables 2 and 3;5 results <br /> exceeding the most conservative ESL or WQO are highlighted in bold-type font. No TPHd or PAHs <br /> ' were detected at concentrations exceeding the most conservative WQO or ESL, except possibly 150 pg/L <br /> TPHd in MW-5 and MW-7,and several PAHs detected in MW-6. No PAHs were detected in the <br /> duplicate sample for MW-6 collected at the same time. It should be noted that TPHd were detected at a <br /> ' concentration of 110 µg/L in the equipment blank sample; therefore, the TPHd detection at MW-7 may be <br /> attributed to cross contamination. A petroleum hydrocarbon-distribution map is presented on Figure 4. <br /> The data usability summary and a copy of the laboratory analytical report are presented as Attachment B. <br /> ' Please see Attachment B for details regarding data qualifiers. <br /> The groundwater sample from MW-5 was analyzed for General Minerals as suggested by the RWQCB <br /> during a semi-annual project meeting in August,2006. The results of the analyses are presented in <br /> ' Attachment C. Analyses of major dissolved-ion species (Na+, Ca 2+,K+,Mg2+, Cl-, S042-,HCO3-)were <br /> expressed by plotting relative concentrations on a trilinear diagram(Piper Diagram), and displaying the <br /> percentage composition of the cation/anion groups (Attachment C). As shown in Attachment C, the <br /> groundwater sample indicates that the water-bearing zone is not controlled by a specific ionic type.5 <br /> A cation-anion balance was conducted to validate the laboratory analysis. The percent error calculated <br /> from the charge balance for MW-5 is 2.7 percent. Less than 5 percent is considered an acceptable error <br /> ' for analysis.' <br /> QUARTERLY OIL-ABSORBENT(OLEOPHILIC) SOCK REPLACEMENT <br /> An oleophilic sock was installed in well MW-1 due to SPO observed in the well. The sock has been <br /> ' monitored and replaced as necessary on a quarterly basis. During the first quarter of 2007,the sock was <br /> weighed but not replaced. A summary of SPO thickness measurements is included in Table 1. <br /> ' QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL <br /> All field procedures were conducted in accordance with SAIC's Quality Assurance and Quality Control <br /> Sample Collection, Handling, and Analysis.8 Based on SAIC's evaluation,all analytical data are usable <br /> ' as qualified for the purpose of determining chemical concentrations in groundwater at the site. Qualified <br /> data with applicable reason codes are shown in Table B-1 of Attachment B. <br /> Unless noted otherwise,analytical data collected in support of this investigation are considered precise, <br /> ' accurate, representative, complete,and comparable, and they may be used for their intended purposes. <br /> CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> The groundwater elevation ranged between 68.09 and 71.24 feet above MSL with a gradient <br /> predominantly towards the east at 0.001 ft/ft. Dissolved-phase TPHd concentrations have historically <br /> ' 5. The ESLs(provided as a reference)are a tool based on conservative standard exposure factors for initial human health and <br /> the environment screening-level evaluations of analytical results. The WQOs are defined by the Porter-Cologne Act as"the <br /> ' levels or limits of water quality constituents or characteristics which are established for the reasonable protection of <br /> beneficial uses of water or the prevention of nuisance within a specific area." <br /> 6. C.W.Fetter, 1994. Applied Hydrogeology,Third Edition,Prentice Hall Inc.,p.421-3. <br /> 7. R.Freeze,J.Cherry, 1979. Groundwater,Prentice Hall Inc.,p.97. <br /> 8. SAIC,2007. Quality Assurance and Quality Control Sample Collection,Handling,and Analysis. April(Updated). <br />