Laserfiche WebLink
g! <br /> d <br /> Phase I Environmental Site Assessment <br /> City of Stockton Multi-Modal Station/Shopping Center <br /> Page 15 <br /> Charles E Skobrak,Sr <br /> y 815 E. Miner Avenue <br /> There were two 500-gallon USTs at the site Both tanks contained leaded motor vehicle fuel There is a <br /> UST Program Tank Permit Application for each tank, which seem to indicate that the tanks were <br /> removed, but there is no other related documentation <br /> 835 E. Miner Avenue <br /> One 5,000-gallon unleaded gasoline UST and one 350-gallon waste oil UST were closed at the site <br /> according to an undated form <br /> Stockton Multimodal Station Site <br /> 936 E.Weber Avenue <br /> Soil Investigation Report <br /> Currently at the site are a record vault building and an adjacent shed, immediately south of the former <br /> UST location As of August 14, 1998, the two buildings were pending demolition The site was <br /> anticipated to be used as a new transportation building, the Stockton Rail/Multimodal Station In 1979, a <br /> 1,000-gallon gasoline tank was removed from the site A Phase II investigation in 1997 indicated that soil <br /> near the former UST was impacted by TPH-G TPH-G was detected at that time in one boring at <br /> ' concentrations of 17,000 and 0 31 mg/kg In a December 5, 1997 letter, the SJCPHS/EHD stated that the <br /> site had been placed in the local oversight program and that the Union Pacific Railroad was designated as <br /> the primary responsible party <br /> In May 1998, two borings were installed at the site in the vicinity of the former UST TPH-G was <br /> i detected at concentrations ranging from 160 to 1,200 mg/kg in the soil samples of one of the borings <br /> h F TPH-G was detected at 46,000 and 1,500 Rg/L in the two groundwater samples collected from the <br /> borings Based on these results, SJCPHS/EHD directed that the site be further assessed <br /> On February 29, 2000, SJCPHS/EHD requested that additional quarterly monitoring of the site be <br /> performed In a letter dated April 28, 2000, Environmental Resources Management (ERM) stated that <br /> they believed four quarters of monitoring was not needed, as the migration of contaminants is limited <br /> ERM recommended quarterly sampling of the down-gradient and annual sampling of all wells <br /> Groundwater analytical results for December 20, 2000 indicate that 1,2-DCA was detected in MW-2 <br /> 4 2 1.2.2 Locations 100-500 feet from the site <br /> 331 N Aurora <br /> Two 5,000-gallon USTs were removed from the site The USTs contained solvent and leaded gasoline <br /> The site was closed by PHS/EHD <br /> ' Production Manufacturing <br /> ' 1000 E. Channel <br /> One 1,000-gallon kerosene UST was removed from the site The site was closed by PHS/EHD <br /> 888 E Lindsay <br /> The site was an old medical waste site,which received"no further action" status <br /> t, Valley Electric Company <br /> 945 E Lindsay <br /> One 1,000-gallon UST was removed from the site The UST contained unleaded product Upon removal <br /> no benzene, toluene, or total xylenes were detected in the soil Total lead was detected at 6 5 mg/kg <br /> F <br /> t, CONDOR <br />