My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2013-2015
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
R
>
REYNOLDS RANCH
>
2680
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0535432
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2013-2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2024 4:04:53 PM
Creation date
6/23/2020 6:39:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2013-2015
RECORD_ID
PR0535432
PE
2351
FACILITY_ID
FA0020431
FACILITY_NAME
COSTCO WHOLESALE #1091
STREET_NUMBER
2680
STREET_NAME
REYNOLDS RANCH
STREET_TYPE
PKWY
City
LODI
Zip
95240
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2680 REYNOLDS RANCH PKWY
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2351_PR0535432_2680 REYNOLDS RANCH_2013-2015.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
407
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Facility Name: Costco # 109 odi (Page 2) RECEIVED <br /> D. Results of Testing/Servicing 2015 <br /> Complete the following checklist: <br /> Software Version Installed: 333.04 eNVIRONME <br /> ®Yes ❑ No* Is the audible alarm operational? <br /> e <br /> ®Yes F-1 No* Is the visual alarm operational? <br /> `` <br /> ®Yes ❑ No* Is the print function operational? <br /> ®Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors visually inspected, functionally tested, and confirmed operational? <br /> ®Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other <br /> equipment will not interfere with their proper operation? <br /> ®Yes ❑ No* If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. <br /> ❑ N/A modem) operational? <br /> ®Yes ❑ No* Did you confirm positive shutdown due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? ®Yes; ❑ No <br /> ❑ N/A <br /> ®Yes ❑ No* For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device is <br /> ❑ N/A the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank fill point(s) and operating properly? At <br /> what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? 90% <br /> El Yes* ® No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other <br /> equipment replaced and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section <br /> E, below. <br /> ❑Yes* ® No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check a// <br /> that app/ )❑ Product; ❑ Water; ❑ Brine. If yes, describe causes in Section E, below. <br /> ®Yes ❑ No* Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set up reports, if <br /> applicable —d <br /> ®Yes I ❑ No* I Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications? <br /> E. Comments: There was a technician onsite from Elite IV performing a repair on a vacuum <br /> sensor and performing a cold start the morning of the testing. We performed the regular <br /> annual monitoring certification after the cold start to suffice as post cold start/annual <br /> testing. It was noticed after the testing.was completed that the date was not changed by <br /> the technician after the cold start. Therefor all of the sensor alarms tripped today will have <br /> the date of 6/7/13. The inspector was not concerned with this being that we are all have the <br /> understanding of what happens. All tests passed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.