My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2009-2011
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LINCOLN
>
1153
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231413
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2009-2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2023 2:11:36 PM
Creation date
6/23/2020 6:47:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2009-2011
RECORD_ID
PR0231413
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003122
FACILITY_NAME
QUIK STOP MARKET #3138
STREET_NUMBER
1153
STREET_NAME
LINCOLN
STREET_TYPE
BLVD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
231-190-12
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1153 LINCOLN BLVD
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0231413_1153 LINCOLN_2009-2011.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
422
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MONITC@ING SYSTEM CERTIFWATION <br />CERTIFICATION /TEST DATE: August 22, 2011 <br />Al. FACILITY <br />■ Yes <br />A2. OWNER <br />Is the audible alarm operational? _ <br />Name <br />Quik Stop Market #138 <br />Is the visual alarm operational? <br />Name <br />Quik Stop Markets, Inc. <br />Address <br />1153 Lincoln Blvd., Tracy, CA 95376 <br />❑ No* <br />Address <br />4567 Enterprise Street, Fremont, CA 94538 <br />Phone # <br />510-657-8500 <br />■ Yes <br />■ Yes <br />Phone # <br />510-657-8500 <br />Contact <br />Michael Karvelot <br />For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. no <br />mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br />fill point(s) and operating properly? If so, at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? <br />Contact <br />Michael Karvelot <br />D. RESULTS OF TESTING / SERVICING <br />Make / Model of Monitoring System: Gilbarco EMC <br />Software Version Installed: 329.01 <br />Complete the following checklist: <br />* In Section E below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br />E. COMMENTS <br />Removed a small amount of water from all three STP sumps. <br />Removed 49 gallons of water from the 87 fill sump. <br />Removed 40 gallons of water from the 89 fill sump. <br />Removed 7 gallons of water from the 91 fill sump. <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />■ Yes <br />❑ No * <br />Is the audible alarm operational? _ <br />■ Yes <br />❑ No* <br />Is the visual alarm operational? <br />■ Yes <br />❑ No <br />Were all sensors visually inspected, functionally tested, and confirmed operational? <br />■ Yes <br />❑ No* <br />Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment <br />will not interfere with their proper operation? <br />❑ Yes <br />❑ No " <br />■ N/A <br />If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modems) <br />operational? <br />■ Yes <br />■ Yes <br />❑ No " <br />❑ N/A <br />❑ No* <br />For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br />monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate <br />positive shutdown? (check all that apply) ■Sump/Trench sensors; [I Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br />Did you confirm positive shut -down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? <br />❑ Yes <br />❑ No* <br />■ N/A <br />For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. no <br />mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br />fill point(s) and operating properly? If so, at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? <br />❑ Yes " <br />■ No <br />Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced <br />and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E, below. <br />■ Yes' <br />❑ No <br />Was any liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? <br />(Check all that apply) El Product; ■Water. If yes, describe causes in Section E, below. <br />■ Yes <br />❑ No* <br />Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to insure proper settings? Attach set-up reports, if applicable. <br />■ Yes <br />❑ No' <br />* In Section E below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br />E. COMMENTS <br />Removed a small amount of water from all three STP sumps. <br />Removed 49 gallons of water from the 87 fill sump. <br />Removed 40 gallons of water from the 89 fill sump. <br />Removed 7 gallons of water from the 91 fill sump. <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications? <br />* In Section E below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br />E. COMMENTS <br />Removed a small amount of water from all three STP sumps. <br />Removed 49 gallons of water from the 87 fill sump. <br />Removed 40 gallons of water from the 89 fill sump. <br />Removed 7 gallons of water from the 91 fill sump. <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.