Laserfiche WebLink
SWRCB, January 2002 <br />Page 6 of 7 <br />8. FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP <br />Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps ❑ <br />Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested ❑ <br />Test Method Developed By: ❑ Sump Manufacturer N Industry Standard ❑ Professional Engineer <br />❑ Other (Specift) <br />Test Method Uses: ❑ Pressure ❑ Vacuum ® Hydrostatic <br />❑ Other (Specify) <br />Test Equipment Used: Incon TS -STS Sump Testing System See Attached <br />Fill Sump #1 Fill Sump # <br />Equipment Resolution: 0.001 <br />Fill Sum # Fill Sump # <br />Sump Diameter: <br />36" <br />Sump Depth: <br />45" <br />Height from Tank Top to Top of <br />Highest Piping Penetration: <br />16" <br />Height from Tank Top to Lowest <br />Electrical Penetration: <br />17" <br />Condition of sump prior to <br />testing: <br />Good <br />Portion of Sump Tested <br />24" <br />Sump Material: <br />Fiberglass <br />Wait time between applying <br />pressure/vacuum/water and <br />starting test: <br />30 min. <br />Test Start Time: <br />10:11 AM <br />Initial Reading (RO: <br />4.6745" <br />Test End Time: <br />10:26 AM <br />Final Reading (RF): <br />4.6745" <br />Test Duration: <br />2 x 15 min. each test <br />Chane in Reading (RF -R ): <br />0 <br />Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: <br />0.002 <br />Is there a sensor in the sump? <br />Yes <br />Does the sensor alarm when <br />either product or water is <br />detected? <br />Yes <br />Was sensor removed for testing? <br />Yes <br />Was sensor properly replaced and <br />verified functional after testing? <br />Yes <br />11 <br />Comments - (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-ap for failed tests) <br />No Repairs Made. <br />Revision: <br />