Laserfiche WebLink
CCR, 7Y= 23, DMSiON 3, CHArrmt 16, UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK REGutATco s <br />CCR TME 23, DMMON 3, CHArrmt 16, UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK REGUfA11ONS <br />equivalent to presale; or, 0.2 gallon per hour defined at normal operating <br />(3) *n independent third party testing laboratory shall evaluate and <br />prove the method using a procedure deemed equivalent to an EPA <br />lure.Any resultant certification shall include a statement by the <br />(3) Monitoring shall be conducted at least annually (once per calendar <br />ano n or laboratory that the conditions under which the test was <br />year) at a pressure designated by the equipment manufacturer. The <br />monitoring method shall be capable of detecting a minimum release <br />ducted were at least as rigorous as those used in the EPA standard <br />6ZIV procedure. This certification shall include statements that: <br />equivalent to 0.1 gallon per hour defined at 150 percent (one and or <br />C\2 '�;: <br />half times) the normal operating pressure. <br />Z (A) The method was tested under various conditions that <br />(d) Piping that conveys hazardous substances under less than atmospheric pressut <br />Qcv simulate interferences likely to be encountered in actual <br />y nLL' Held conditions (no fewer nor less rigorous than the <br />(suction piping) shall be tested at Least every three years at a pressure <br />designated by the rest equipment manufacturer. The test method shall be <br />environmental conditions used in the corresponding EPA <br />capable of detecting a minimum release equivalent to 0.1 gallon per hour <br />test procedure): <br />defined at a minimum of 40 psi. If the piping;cannot be isolated from the tan <br />for testing purposes, the piping shall be testedusing an overfilled volumetric <br />(B) Each condition under which the method was tested was <br />tank integrity test or other test method meeting, the requirements of section <br />varied over a range expected to be encountered in 75 <br />percent of the normal test cases; <br />2643(f), if approved by the local agency. Dail monitoring shalt be performed <br />as described in Appendix U except for emergen, cy generator systems, which mr <br />be monitored less often, but at least monthly. tViritten records describing the <br />(C) Alt portions of the equipment or method evaluated received <br />results of the monitoring shalt be maintained I& accordance with section <br />the same evaluation; <br />2712(b). <br />(D) The amount of data collected and the statistical analysis aro <br />(e) Piping that conveys hazardous substances by the force of gravity (excluding <br />at least as extensive and rigorous as the data collected and <br />statistical analysis used in the corresponding EPA test <br />vertical drops) shall be monitored at least onceevery two years at a pressure <br />designated by the test equipment man The method shall be capable <br />procedure and are sufficient to draw reasonable <br />conclusions about the equipment or method being <br />of detecting a minimum release equivalent to ;1 gallon per hour defined at 41 <br />=m <br />evaluated* <br />psi. If the piping cannot be Isolatedthe for testing purposes, the <br />piping shalt be tested using an overfilled voluntric rank integrity, test or othd <br />test method' meeting the requirements of section 2643(f) if approved by the <br />(E) The full-sized version of the leak detection equipment was <br />local agency. <br />physically tested; and <br />(f) Each quantitative release detection method, A the exception of manual <br />(F) The experimental conditions under which the evaluation <br />was performed and the conditions under which the method <br />inventory, reconcillatiott and manual tank gaug�t& shalt be certified to comply <br />with. the pe standard(s) specified in tgis section and shall be <br />was: recommended for use have been fulldisclosed and <br />Y <br />subject <br />to limitations specified in the certification. Ibif certification shall be obtained <br />thatthe evaluation was not based solely on theory or <br />calculation.. <br />by the equipment manufacturer following one of the evaluation procedures In <br />subdivisions (1) through (3) below; <br />(4) The evaluation results referred to in subsections (f)(2) and (f)(3) <br />(1) Min date third party testing laboratory shalt evaluate and <br />shall contain the same information and shall be reported <br />followingthe same general format as the EPA standard results <br />approve the method using the appropriate "EPA Standard Test <br />Procedure for Ieak detection equipmerit in Appendix IV; or, <br />sheet assay corresponding EPA test procedure. <br />2(g) <br />() M independent third party testing laboratory shall evaluate and <br />The underground s tank owner or shall notify the local agency <br />48 hours before conducting a tank or piping integrity test unless the <br />approve the method using a volun . nsus standard that Is <br />intended for the method being evaluated,• or, <br />notifications requ i by the local agency. Within 30 calendar days <br />� <br />of comptetim of an u tank or I <br />piping integrity test. the grt)a <br />owner or operator shas Provide the local agency with a report. The results of <br />4-7 <br />4-g <br />,• <br />